Message from @Clive

Discord ID: 595343332616699904


2019-07-01 19:34:58 UTC  

But I wannaaaaaa!!

2019-07-01 19:39:25 UTC  

@Shadows Fair point. We've legalized abortion. After all, there is no difference in killing an undeveloped western fetus and killing a backwards unenlightened Muslim.

2019-07-01 19:45:26 UTC  

I think we should abolish the electoral college, ebate?

2019-07-01 19:45:31 UTC  

debate*

2019-07-01 19:48:13 UTC  

@DJ_Anuz
The snake is coiled and *HAS* struck before... Recently.
@Shadows
Because that's rediculous. We don't like France and South Africa, nobody's said nuke them.

2019-07-01 19:48:43 UTC  

@Clive Just to let you know, when you are calculating things based on pure numbers, you won't normally get the outcome you want because humans aren't just math. But if you also have a good argument to go with it, it might be worth thinking/talking about.

2019-07-01 19:49:18 UTC  

Good math + good argument should be acquired

2019-07-01 19:50:35 UTC  

Ya, its not just good enough to say X number of people here = you win, because you don't always know how people will behave.

2019-07-01 19:52:30 UTC  

And you dont know if itll stay like that

2019-07-01 19:52:45 UTC  

Electoral college is to keep it fair, not to keep republicans winning

2019-07-01 19:53:02 UTC  

So 40 years from now it may be different, it may be backwards

2019-07-01 19:53:14 UTC  

@Shadows to be fair, I don't honestly think we should abolish the EC, I'm pointing out the irony of, if every red state had every eligible adult vote for who that state *generally* supported based on 2016 voting patterns, then Re > Dem because red states house more +18 humans than blue states, currently

2019-07-01 19:53:34 UTC  

can i attach the spreadhseet i made? so you can judge for yourselves?

2019-07-01 19:53:38 UTC  

idk how

2019-07-01 19:53:55 UTC  

Screenshot it put it in <#266396659062145025>

2019-07-01 19:54:00 UTC  

Or link it in <#266401012967931905>

2019-07-01 19:56:33 UTC  

Abolishing the EC would likely secure republican victories for now, but it would also be awful for future generations.

2019-07-01 19:56:57 UTC  

Could secure*

Yes

2019-07-01 19:57:06 UTC  

No way of knowing how fucked the future would be though

2019-07-01 19:57:58 UTC  

Not really something we need worry about, i'm working on homemade nukes, it will be over soon.

2019-07-01 20:01:51 UTC  

done

2019-07-01 20:12:01 UTC  

"if every eligible adult voted"
But that literally never happens

2019-07-01 20:18:16 UTC  

Indeed.

2019-07-01 20:31:47 UTC  

@Shadows
Don't joke too hard about that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hahn

2019-07-01 20:32:28 UTC  

David was an hero

2019-07-01 20:36:52 UTC  

Well... He did almost build a nuclear bomb and all...

2019-07-02 01:27:57 UTC  

"After his time on USS Enterprise, Hahn enlisted"

I don't remember this episode

2019-07-02 04:53:50 UTC  

*"After his time on USS* ENTERPRISE *, Hahn enlisted in the Marines and was stationed in North Carolina."*

(Normally I wouldn't, but there's some some things I can't and shouldn't be allowed to tolerate.)

2019-07-02 05:36:26 UTC  

@Deleted User is actually @Shadows. Change my mind

2019-07-02 06:27:22 UTC  

@DJ_Anuz
¿Voice chat? He can't be logged on as both without blowing up vc...

2019-07-02 06:47:23 UTC  

I also thought he might be fake. He seems less aggressive than the first time.

2019-07-02 06:47:44 UTC  

He didnt even call me a Jew yet.

2019-07-02 16:04:45 UTC  

“Assault weapons” have but ONE definition; Automatic ᵃⁿᵈ/ₒᵣ burst fire compatible detachable magaᵶine fed firearms. If it’s semi-automatic, it’s NOT an "assault" anything.
You’ll note there is no refrence to caliber. That’s not an accident. Caliber doesn’t matter.

2019-07-02 16:06:54 UTC  

That's the definition of an "assault rifle", not an "assault weapon". You've already fell for the fake news

2019-07-02 16:12:27 UTC  

Yeah, assault weapon doesn't mean shit, especially if you go by what they try to ban to keep people from getting ahold of 'assault weapons.'

2019-07-02 16:14:28 UTC  

To be honest, as little as the gun grabbers actually care about fidelity of language, I'm surprised they don't just use the phrase assault rifle.

2019-07-02 16:15:52 UTC  

plausible deniability, perhaps? Directly using a defined term in the wrong fashion would be too obvious

2019-07-02 16:16:49 UTC  

so they came up with something really close and let the confusion come naturally

2019-07-02 16:19:03 UTC  

That's probably it.

2019-07-02 16:20:01 UTC  

Subterfuge