Yeah, like if you compare someone whose ancestors are from geographies really far away the differences add up

Its not the geographics

Its the race

The dna

But of you look at the various ethnic groupsnin between the geographies, it seems the traits slowly and slowly change as you move along the map

I almost read that wrong like an idiot I thought you were saying Africans and elephants

In normal cases

Yes, thats is true. Doesnt deny the existence of race though @Siyovaxsh En-sipad-zid-ana

Race doesnt even have a real definition, its arbitrary

No its not

It is

Theres no white race, unless you think nord means white

Or something like that

No black race either

They just group certain ethnicities together for convenience, but ethnicities are not the same as the others in a defined race, and the groups on the edges will end up sharing traits with other ethnicites also on the edge of ankther defined race

So black lives matter is arbitrary?

You could argue that lol

Left loves race politics tho

I mean if you think about it, thats why its even hard to classify asexual microbes and such as a particular species

German is also a culture tho lol

Have a native language they can all understand

Germanic is race

Thats what an ethnicity consists of lol

I am germanic

German is an ethnicity, most German-Americans don't speak German or have German "culture"

Yeah, Germanic race is more concrete than a white race

Ethnicity is heritage passed down by genetics

but just because those demographics make up that group doesnt make them not a group in and of themselves, am i wrong?

I mean I think that it is pretty easy to tell the difference between a person of European descent (which is what is meant by white) and somehow not of European descent

that new group can create its own characteristics

Yeah, but their ancestors are all from a pool that did come from a group that spoke language they could all understand @Deleted User

You're saying that these people

And these people

Are not easily distinguishable?

😂 👆

They are lol

So you acknowledge that the white race is real?

Thats not race lol

How is it not a race?

Cause theres no trait that unites all white people that is different from other groups

...

So pale skin and Caucasoid bone structure are what? Not unique to Europeans?

i feel like Alt-Hype could help : )

Funny though when it comes to reparations everyone knows who is and isn't white

Much of Europeans dont have pale skin, and North Asians have pale skin too. Bome structure is more similar among Mediterranean people of Euro and Asian background than to someone from Northern europe

Reperarions are retarded

>much of Europeans don't have pale skin

Well, most of Europe doesn't have the skin of Nordics, but they all have pale skin, and the latter part of my statement excludes Asians for they have Mongoloid, not Caucasoid, bone structures.

Also Southern Europeans, Middle Easterners, and Nordics all have Caucasoid bone structures, which is why I prefaced it on pale skin too to differentiate.

>lol races don't exist, there is literally nothing that unites all these people together

Ever heard of haplogroups? @Siyovaxsh En-sipad-zid-ana

Yeah

Theres light skinned caucasians in Middle East, Iran, Afganistan, etc

yes and?

And theyre closer to dark skinner Afghans than a nord

skin color is just a secondary characteristic

mongoloids have different skin colors between them but no one ever tries to deny they're of the same race

only caucasoids are said to be of a different race by race deniers because of their skin color

The other dude said white means caucasiam and light skin

he's wrong

white means indo-european, which is an ethnicity. not every caucasian is indo-european, but every indo-european is caucasian

oh

Indians are also Indo-Europeans though and they're certainly not white

indians are mutts between caucasoids and australoids

I mean Indo European is more tangible than white, but most people wouldnt say north indians and iranians are white

iranians are

indians are very mutted so it varies

you need to be both caucasian and indo-european to be considered white

Iranians are debatable

wrong

Well thats the problem right there dude

iranians are caucasians and indo-european

Its kind of arbitrary

therefore white

@Siyovaxsh En-sipad-zid-ana no it isn't arbitrary

it is based on clear genetic and cultural markers

His definition is, yours isnt as much

just because some people disagree doesn't mean that it is arbitrary because it keeps being true

But you dont consider native european groups like the basque as white?

they're caucasoid but not indo-european

To the extent that it is arbitrary is just where to draw the line, no one however would claim that for example Dravidians are white, and because there exist certain groups where everyone is certain that they do no belong, white racialism is real.

I'm a negroid

Okay

Jk

Dravidians are Caucasians I think tho technically

@Deleted User the line isn't arbitrary though

unless you're talking about multiracial people

It is arbitrary, for example talk to a Nordicist and they say that anyone who isn't Northwestern European is not white.

If you believe in evolution, then in the same species, distinctions are kind of arbitrary

I use to be a nordicist until I realized its all retarded

@Deleted User in this case it's not because it is arbitrary but rather because he's wrong

Varg for example has said that African-Americans are whiter than Italians because the former has approximately 20% Northwestern European DNA.

Just claim your ethnicity if you care, your ancestors werent fighting for race

varg is a retard

Granted, Varg is a retard, but it is just an example.

I do not agree with Nordicism

But it cannot be ignored

you guys for some reason keep rejecting that truth exists in this matter

it's not because someone disagrees that it means it's wrong

Theres no white race, we have ethnicities, with closer geographic ones being more similar