...

So pale skin and Caucasoid bone structure are what? Not unique to Europeans?

i feel like Alt-Hype could help : )

Funny though when it comes to reparations everyone knows who is and isn't white

Much of Europeans dont have pale skin, and North Asians have pale skin too. Bome structure is more similar among Mediterranean people of Euro and Asian background than to someone from Northern europe

Reperarions are retarded

>much of Europeans don't have pale skin

Well, most of Europe doesn't have the skin of Nordics, but they all have pale skin, and the latter part of my statement excludes Asians for they have Mongoloid, not Caucasoid, bone structures.

Also Southern Europeans, Middle Easterners, and Nordics all have Caucasoid bone structures, which is why I prefaced it on pale skin too to differentiate.

>lol races don't exist, there is literally nothing that unites all these people together

Ever heard of haplogroups? @Siyovaxsh En-sipad-zid-ana

Yeah

Theres light skinned caucasians in Middle East, Iran, Afganistan, etc

yes and?

And theyre closer to dark skinner Afghans than a nord

skin color is just a secondary characteristic

mongoloids have different skin colors between them but no one ever tries to deny they're of the same race

only caucasoids are said to be of a different race by race deniers because of their skin color

The other dude said white means caucasiam and light skin

he's wrong

white means indo-european, which is an ethnicity. not every caucasian is indo-european, but every indo-european is caucasian

oh

Indians are also Indo-Europeans though and they're certainly not white

indians are mutts between caucasoids and australoids

I mean Indo European is more tangible than white, but most people wouldnt say north indians and iranians are white

iranians are

indians are very mutted so it varies

you need to be both caucasian and indo-european to be considered white

Iranians are debatable

wrong

Well thats the problem right there dude

iranians are caucasians and indo-european

Its kind of arbitrary

therefore white

@Siyovaxsh En-sipad-zid-ana no it isn't arbitrary

it is based on clear genetic and cultural markers

His definition is, yours isnt as much

just because some people disagree doesn't mean that it is arbitrary because it keeps being true

But you dont consider native european groups like the basque as white?

they're caucasoid but not indo-european

To the extent that it is arbitrary is just where to draw the line, no one however would claim that for example Dravidians are white, and because there exist certain groups where everyone is certain that they do no belong, white racialism is real.

I'm a negroid