well she did post a pic and i couldn't reverse search it on google

@Deleted User @Euro-American Bandit

sadly she was banned and it was erased

from hopps

not on this server

in hopps realm

What did they ban them for?

being a toxic commie and pissing off everyone on the server

10 days in a row

Real Anarcho-monarchist Gang hours

Anarcho-monarchism cannot be a real thing

@Swiss Cheese they could easily have pics from random girls

yeah but i couldn't reverse search it

on google

or in facebook or any of those

Ugh

If you have a private fb account

Google wont show your pics

nope its pretty public

sorry for late response

oh wait

i am dumb

miss read that

I have this one friend who believes in food redistribution as a method if preventing starvation.
Would this be achievable on a global scale?

No

A country needs to be self sustainingg

Because more food leads to more babies aka more demand for food

If you institute some program of redistribution it can end at any time for many different reasons

And then you have chaos and starvation when there is now a food supply crises. Its a really bad idea to mess with a nations food supply

@Da_Fish @Doctor Anon wtf

i dont support antifa but dont you think it ruins the point of the server to ban everyone of an idealogy just because theirs rumors a few of them are ddoxing on discord

why did you say this in OTD

Antifa == Usually iolent scum

we don't want that here

@L0GAN wasn't my decision you little cuck

@Doctor Anon your the owner

you can undo decisions

Consuls have autonomy

Full autonomy

That's the point

let us vote on the consuls if we gonan give em power

no lol

pope back when he was staff was mocked for being libtarded

@L0GAN lol, if you get 30 people to agree to an election, I will hold one

do a poll in announcements

who wants an election

Republics dont last

that is a fact

^

democratic republics

no government lasts

@campodin all republics are democratic

republic refers to a representative democracy

@L0GAN how about we elect staff and staff elect consul

sounds good

eh

that would be more like parliament tho

no, republic is a mixed state by definition

a state in which supreme ***power is held by the people and their elected representatives***, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

Rome was better as an Empire

Senate became so corrupt

like every fucking republic

the us is different

our politics arent very extreme

and depend on centrist voters

@L0GAN each side likes to pit other side as extremists

Both are very moderate though

Republics are clown shows

That get nothing done and just bitch over who is right and wrong

(but then again its not like they have any interest in their politics other than personal gain)

And then leaving it up to people to vote which is a horrible idea

I feel like the reason democrats want illegal immigrants is the cheap labor that isnt the governments problem to fix

@☦Default™#1027

Did he leave

Ha

@L0GAN you are using are modern bastardization of the term republican. Originally it was meant to describe the mixed government.

Mixed government (or a mixed constitution) is a form of government that combines elements of democracy (polity), aristocracy and monarchy, making impossible their respective degenerations which are conceived as anarchy, oligarchy and tyranny.[1] The idea was popularized during classical antiquity in order to describe the stability, the innovation and the success of the republic as a form of government developed under the Roman constitution.

@campodin you said by definition

no definition of republic is mixed gov

It is a mixed government by definition

no

every single republic is a mixed government

thats a way to interpret it

but your doing this

"a republic has elected officials and an appointed or elected leader- a republic is a mixed gov- a mixed gov can be non democratic"

CAN BE

republics are always democratic

republics always have democratic elements

The term republic was first coined c. 500 BCE in Rome, but over time the term has undergone several changes in meaning. Initially the Latin term res publica signified the earlier "partial form of democracy" as found in Rome from c. 500 BCE until c. 27 BCE. In this early Roman partial-democracy, the power of the aristocratic or patrician class who held all of the seats in the Roman Senate, was checked by the institution of the consulship, whose two consul/vice-rulers were elected annually by the free citizens or plebes of Rome. The ancient Roman definition of the word differs from the modern use of the term, where no leadership positions are held to be restricted to only the "ruling class".[10][11]

in the case of appointed leader that refrences a parliamentary system

which is still democratic

In an old Republic there are positions you can only get by inheritance.

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 exactly. democracy, aristocracy, and oligarchy

@Summī Imperator, 呪い殿 in modern republic, there are positions the president appoints

Yes, but those aren't the same.

sorry not oligarchy, that is the same as aristocracy

More or less.

if everyone has the **ability** to become a member of the state, its a democracy

@Doctor Anon can you take me off the Polls rank

with the dictatorship, rome even included the "monarchy" aspect