John D supposedly used a cullimator on his lasers

It the copper pipes he used

so youre ignoring my question?

1st one

Were too wide to have any effect

So you still get that high divergence rate

Of which were no where in his presented calculations

I’m so confused, are you trying to answer a question?

i asked if he had evidence to back up his assertion

He brought up beam divergence which is a significant problem

I provided you evidence

That lies in the reports they themselves presented

you were talking about things, but you didnt actually provide evidence

Yeah I gotta admit, you still have burden of proof, Chief

what if you did the laser test correctly and posted the video?

Do I have to read you FE cores report

For you

Or John Ds report

That he used a bubble level on

To level the laser

Which is laughable

When you are trying to prove the non-existence of laser refraction

In the math he presented

Or even more laughable

As to how FE Core balanced the laser by pointing it at the horizon

Which means it would be slightly bent down

As well as they broke the collimator prior to testing

Nor did they bring the target grid to their target sites

Or get any pictures of the laser hitting the target

All verified by the president of the FE Core himself

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids I can go on all day about the flaws in their experiments

Or the willful deception

Whichever one you prefer

Considering these people are getting thousands in donations

Yet not providing any tangible results from their experiments

Or putting in even a sliver of an attempt to do it properly

id love to see your video of your laser test done right

I’m not going to do a laser test

ok then

Because a laser test won’t prove anything

Because refraction exists

And divergence exists

then youre wasting my time with this arent you

if thats the case then it doesnt matter if they got it wrong

In deed

They are wasting their time

As well as donator money

And they know it

If you can either control or account for refraction then you can do it right

Well considering they used the wrong formula for refraction

Lol some dude tried to tell me that "gravity" pulls the light on a lighthouse down to account for curvature 😂

One that has been out of date for 60 years

The theory of gravity seems to be the go-to globe earth backup.

No proof.

One that calculates for refraction through 2 mediums

Also they lied about the divergence rate on their unit

So that’s 2 lies they made

As well as claiming they hit a target even though the grid was not at any of the 6 target sites

As confirmed by the FE core members themselves

What is that formula? Like, snail or something?

Snell’s law

Oakheart do you know how a gravimeter works

Wolfie6020 even shows in his videos that the further away something is from the equator

To more it weighs

But if you want to talk about the light house

Nathan Oakley has some interesting leaked messages about it

But I think the biggest challenge for flat earthers

Would be explaining how gyrocompasses could possibly work on a flat plane

Gravity is a theory.

@🎃Oakheart🎃 you’re avoiding pretty much everything he said

So what causes the directional influence downwards

That's just how things work

You guys believe this magical, unseen force controls everything and then call that proof.

“That’s just how things work” pretty big brain right there

Gravity does not control everything, and it’s not unseen

So what makes thins go down

Not really.

Maybe gravity is real, but it doesn't prove a globe.

Because it doesn't work the way you think.

With the gravitational constant, it necessarily would

**SPHERICAL**

You understand that gravity works by pulling things towards the center of mass

So if gravity exists as we know it

On a flat earth we could be pulled to true north

Ok so what if gravity was just pulling downwards.

Like I said

You're bending the theory to fit a globe.

Sounds like you are bending the theory to fit the flat earth to me

The sword cuts both ways.

The “downwards” “force” is towards the center of mass. The Earth itself would form to the most stable state, which is a sphere,

No because the well established theory is that it pulls towards center mass

But you are the one trying to bend it not me

Scimitars don’t cut both ways

By saying it just pulls downwards

You are trying to say it pulls to a center mass.

**SPHERICAL**

Lol so we'd all fly to the North pole.

Clearly not.

Because that is what the well established theory of gravity states