No proof.

One that calculates for refraction through 2 mediums

Also they lied about the divergence rate on their unit

So that’s 2 lies they made

As well as claiming they hit a target even though the grid was not at any of the 6 target sites

As confirmed by the FE core members themselves

What is that formula? Like, snail or something?

Snell’s law

Oakheart do you know how a gravimeter works

Wolfie6020 even shows in his videos that the further away something is from the equator

To more it weighs

But if you want to talk about the light house

Nathan Oakley has some interesting leaked messages about it

But I think the biggest challenge for flat earthers

Would be explaining how gyrocompasses could possibly work on a flat plane

Gravity is a theory.

@🎃Oakheart🎃 you’re avoiding pretty much everything he said

So what causes the directional influence downwards

That's just how things work

You guys believe this magical, unseen force controls everything and then call that proof.

“That’s just how things work” pretty big brain right there

Gravity does not control everything, and it’s not unseen

So what makes thins go down

Not really.

Maybe gravity is real, but it doesn't prove a globe.

Because it doesn't work the way you think.

With the gravitational constant, it necessarily would

**SPHERICAL**

You understand that gravity works by pulling things towards the center of mass

So if gravity exists as we know it

On a flat earth we could be pulled to true north

Ok so what if gravity was just pulling downwards.

Like I said

You're bending the theory to fit a globe.

Sounds like you are bending the theory to fit the flat earth to me

The sword cuts both ways.

The “downwards” “force” is towards the center of mass. The Earth itself would form to the most stable state, which is a sphere,

No because the well established theory is that it pulls towards center mass

But you are the one trying to bend it not me

Scimitars don’t cut both ways