civil-debate
Discord ID: 538929818834698260
127,199 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 91/509
| Next
if it couldnt do better things we would still be using black and white tvs
we dont buy black and white tvs cause the smart tv can do better things
i never have any issues with my smart tv
had it about 9 years
sean gToday at 10:03 AM
Why wouldnโt we just use old tech in TVs
we use the neew tech because it can do better things
ok bottom line is we use smart tvs cause it can do better things than black n white tv right
maybe
probably
ok well are we gonna get into planned obsolecesne as compared to the way nasa builds things for space
is nasa building my smart tv for space or is my tv being made to break so we can keep the economy going
stop gossiping about NASA ๐
!ban
im just saying are we gonna build the smart tv to last
or we making the smart tv to break like they do it for consumer use
just make a tv yourself
4head
planned obsolescence u know what that is right
?
we were comparing the tvs i jsut wanna know how we are gonna build them
they gonna use the same elctric components they use in satellites?
so for the record according to u as long as noone dies and it doesnt cost too much you would rather be able to travel 250 miles than 250thousand miles
is that what u think
well we sent humans out there in 1969 they were fine
i was gonna respond to it
lol my bad
i feel like everyday in here i get nowhere
we got past the safety and risk issue in 1969 we did it many times noone got sick or died
so the safety thing is not an issue
we already did it
with worse tech
wwhats ur question
Yo yo yo whatโs going on here chiefs?
more parts to go wrong if its being built for regular consumption when its in space dont they build it differently
built
nevermind was build
i feel u i was a globe then fe then globe then fe i jsut dont know anymore
Woah chief are you a flat earther
Damn how did you get convinced
well when i see the vast amount of distance humas went 50 years ago and now we cant even come close it makes me wonder
if ur model of earth is wrong a lot llol
a lot is wrong about what u think u know if ur model of earth is wrong
Hmm
So hows the earth chief
im just saying if u think its a globe and its really flat then a lot about what u think u know is wrong
i know all the math for the globe model works it kinda matches our observations
This server looks fun
we still see too far
yeah its fune here dr
teh globe models explenation for why we see too far is magical at best
Iโm going to study astronomy so I canโt even care a bit about what feโers are sayin but
Itโs fun so
should be able to post pics in here i know
What are yโall even talking about
we are talkin about human space travel and how it is more advanced now even though we can only get a human 400 miles from earth as opposed to 1969 when we landed men on the moon
right sean is that accurate
we are more advanced now when it comes to human space travel now than in 1969
thats waht u area saying
ill leave the distance part out lol
ok leave the distance part out
u are saying we are more advanced at human space travel now than in 1969
noone died in 1969 on the way to or from the moon
veryone was safe and sound how can safety be a part of it
can we take safety off the table ?
3 people left went to the moon 3 people came back noone died or got sick
safe and sound
so
after they died we got it and noone died on the moon missions
Lol this is funny to watch
idk 6
not sure really
noone died on the moon landings
i u nderstand people have died in space exploration
did anyone died when we sent a man to the moon
when
Apollo's 1 fire: Though the Apollo missions never lost an astronaut during a spaceflight . that sentence came off the site u just linked me to
we were good we landed men on the moon and brought them backk safe and sound
ok people died to get us there
once we got their we did it fine
ok people died testing the stuff then we got it all tested went to the moon and back everyone lived and was healthy correct ?
thats being biased ?
ok people died testing this stuff out then we got it all tested everyone left for the moon and came back safe and sound
multiple times
1967 before we had it all tested and went to the moon safely
i told u before hand yes people died got hurt but once we got it all tested we did it fine
u arent showing me where we didnt travel to the moon safely once we had it all tested
ok hang on
people died testing the space equipment then we did it fine a few times then we had a problem and got worse at space travel for humans yes
this has been my argument the whole time we were good at space travel then we got worse
that is my argument lol
distance safety we got worse
whatever factor u wanna use its not as good anymore
we are worse at space travel now than we at one point were
how about we are worse at traveling to the moon now than we were in 1969 is that acceptable lol
alright boys
who thinks the earth is flat
bill do u think we are better today at human space travel or were we better at human space travel in 1969
i would hope that we are better today
ok how about human space travel when it comes to traveling to the moon are we better today or were we better in 1069
1969
strictly when it comes to human space travel to the moon are we better now or worse
i told u their is other factors than distance
well in the space race of the late 19th century, the US was in a major race against Soviet Russia to land their first man on the moon, and in the race, both nations likely ignored many safety factors in an effort to get to the moon faster
we could've been more efficient but a lot less safe
as of recent times, getting to the moon has become a prospect of little importance and so we have increased safety which in turn compromises efficiency
it depends on what factors you are debating
if we get hit with an asteroid like the one that took out the dinosaurs and humans get wiped out of the universe because we dont have a base on the moon its nasas fault lol
a base on the moon would definitely not be much of a help for human population
definitely not enough to restart the population as a whole
how many people would it take
100 ? 500 ?
yeah we prolly dont have the tech yet for a moonbase u need more gravity right
how do u know 100 years
to even say its possible is a stretch because we have never dont it before so
doesnt matter we cant get to the moon anymore
no we dont have the technology to get to the moon
nasa admits this
that technology was lost or destroyed we dont have it anymore
its a painful process to get it back
thats a nasa astronaut
youtube is great for video
u want audio ?
idk
have a good day at work
risk doesnt reach reward
iss cam is blue screen
they lost signal lol
can i say the n word
nigga?
yes :trihard:
CX
They landed on the moon but saw aliens and they buried the evidence, and we haven't went back since
Since Apollo 17
<:trolled:555217274907262976>
lol
astral did u do what i said
take that google earth ball zoomed out all the way
then shrink it accordingly for another 190k miles out
<img src="https://i.redd.it/9zpaqx13ppq01.jpg" alt="Related image"/>
**STEEN**
I think I have beat flat earthers, still no answers for why the Government would hide the shape of the earth. Didn't even need to use science or math all along lol.
hi
The government has it's reason and we can only give educated of why but we can't tell you why someone else is lying
Hi
--you willing to listen to 2 vids (2, 5 min videos = 10mins)? ๐ค ....
if u want to know why they would hide it i could come up with some things but if u wanna debate me on if knowledge is power then i guess what i have to say doesnt matter
its all speculation anyways as to why
Are ppl coming out as flat earthers just for the meme ๐๐๐
The point I'm making is there is no reason why they would. I would be willing to listen to all the math and science of how the Earth is flat, even though it is all flawed since the earth has to be a sphere. Especially since it's silly to think our planet is the ONLY flat planet, which I'm 90% sure is what the head of the flat Earth organization has stated.
But considering everyone with a boat can go at Antartica and run around there, immediately disproving the ice wall theory, and the fact that anyone with a camera and weather balloon or something similar could also see if there earth was flat. Which I encourage you to try, maybe those balloons are extremely expensive idk, but if you can just get a camera, hit record, attach it to althat kind of balloon, and see for yourself that the Earth is round.
Our entire government would have to be based around keeping a secret that is unbearably disproveable and a secret that is not even worth keeping.
And I do believe knowlage is power, but I think my interpretation of that is different as it makes no sense in this context so if you want Jeremy, tell me what that means to you.
I only take the time to say this because I have strong beliefs around the subject of ignorance and if I can make you people that much more aware and intelligent, then I complete my purpose just a little more.
Any physicl life on Mars? for one example? ๐ค
no?
any of the OTHERS? in our aka solar system? NO?
hmm gee whiz. ๐ก
muss mean EARTH = DIFFERENT <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> ๐
Logan paul is a flat earther. Disgraced this community. No one likes him
@Phofefas posting invites? <:lul:484994724118134784> lulz @ u
๐
. @Pinnaplia
"Why the lie/s" ? Tryu these for starters ...
https://youtu.be/8u4y_HVwQ_c
https://youtu.be/eA5XbSV5IVM
hey, howbouDAT! <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>
**cash me ousside** tho <:snapsnap:484956825863585792>
Bhad barbie is not a flat earther therefore does not deserve a mention
last time i checked the bible doesnt describe the shape of the earth
the Earth is *round*
you cant just say the earth is if it was that easy then this debate would be over
a COOKIE is round ๐ช <:smart:484956754489376781>
and should have been over like 300 years ago
cookie is round therefore Earth is square
didn't have the tech and instant (worldwide) communications, like we do now
---etc
but yet they still proved gravity and a ton of other things
.
Btw: Fyi .. there are over 200+ biblical verses that describe a flat and or stationary and or domed enclosed earth โ
show me 10
but these biblical verses are not able to be proven
how about 240
https://www.flatearthdoctrine.com/flat-earth-scriptures/
alright ill take it
even though im not a bible guy ill still read some
โ
but what if ur not religious
if you're into the heliocentric globe model you ARE "Religious" ....
wdym?
uh
what
WITH PSEUDO-SCIENCE books and programs, mass media and public education, universities and government propaganda, the world has been systematically brain-washed, slowly indoctrinated over centuries into the unquestioning belief of the greatest lie of all time. A multi-generational conspiracy has succeeded, in the minds of the masses, to pick up the fixed Earth, shape it into a ball, spin it in circles, and throw it into orbit around the Sun.
The heliocentric model was an ancient Babylonian lucifarian-belief that was funded by pagan sun-worshipers, and supported by the church of satan and the occult. The astronomers were Jesuit priests, and even today, space is controlled by Nasa and the Vatican.๏ปฟ
The Vatican owns the most Telescopes in the world, and have longer than anyone.๏ปฟincluding their favorite telescope .. "l.u.c.i.f.e.r." pfftโ [LARGE bINOCULAR tELESCOPE nEAR-iNFRARED UTILITY with CAMERA and INTEGRAL FIELD-uNIT for EXTRAGALACTIC RESEARCH]
-->> You are in a cult of sun-worshiping pagans lead by lucifarians which makes you part of a "religion" whether you know it or not...
mmm wow
i wouldn't call it a religion if it applicable to the world around us
ok so the one i decided to pick out was "Ezekiel 45:1" the guy that made the website put this as a description of it "Extremely Large Area of Land is FLAT, no curvature:" yet the actual scripture says "When you divide the land among the tribes of Israel, you must set aside a section for the LORD as his holy portion. This piece of land will be 8 1/3 miles long and 6 2/3 miles wide. The entire area will be holy." ok i get it its a large area of land but im pretty sure that 8 miles isnt enough to see a massive curvature
**Ezekiel 45:1 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**
```Dust
The Holy District
<1> When you allot the land as an inheritance, you shall set aside for the Lord a portion of the land as a holy district, twenty-five thousand cubits long and twenty thousand cubits wide; it shall be holy throughout its entire extent. ```
like i think people under estimate the curve of the earth
the earth isnt some small object its actually really big (at least compared to us it is)
ikr
exactly
people look for the curve but don't realise how big the curve is
smh
juss, smfhh..
TRY THESE 100 thennnnnnnn okkkkkkkkkkkkkk
https://www.openbible.info/topics/flat_earth
wtfffffffff
mmm wow
bible
that was 2000 years ago
out of 240, made by ONE FKN GUYYYYYY ..and ..he picks one !
Fdas/
hnbg
fs
nm
b fhnkogsd
when everyone thought the earth was flat
lol
no, they KNEW it was (is)
wat
ok bud
and , they were a LOT smarter than modernday man
and more in-tune with Spirituality (as a whole species)
why disprove the curvature of Earth?
yeah ok you
dont know your ass from a hole in the wall
neither do > 90% of humanity
ok
sure
buddy
keep on sleepwalking kiddo (infant soul) ...
mhm
okay buckaroo
isnt this supposed to be civil
wheres the images of the flat Earth
lol
@tekashi u show your Stubborness
mhm
how
when
where
-- @Happygrandad Everyyy pic/footage is OF flat earth..
oh ok
dude u literally prove ur stubborn
alright then
DO u believe physics is wrong
also what is a hollow Earther?
astrophysics (theoretical physics) s wrong, yes indeed...
ok
i need some proof here
evidence
theoretical physics is not wrong
it's just adapting
because i already have tons of research and evidence found by professional scientists that physics are in fact real
how do u think you're electronics work
some magic in the air?
astrophysics is different from theoretical physics
ASTROOOOOO physicsssssssssss
okie
cawn
rjeioauYou
Reawddd
Derpppp
127,199 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 91/509
| Next