Message from @jeremy
Discord ID: 569911205184143360
i u nderstand people have died in space exploration
did anyone died when we sent a man to the moon
when
Apollo's 1 fire: Though the Apollo missions never lost an astronaut during a spaceflight . that sentence came off the site u just linked me to
we were good we landed men on the moon and brought them backk safe and sound
ok people died to get us there
once we got their we did it fine
ok people died testing the stuff then we got it all tested went to the moon and back everyone lived and was healthy correct ?
thats being biased ?
ok people died testing this stuff out then we got it all tested everyone left for the moon and came back safe and sound
multiple times
1967 before we had it all tested and went to the moon safely
i told u before hand yes people died got hurt but once we got it all tested we did it fine
u arent showing me where we didnt travel to the moon safely once we had it all tested
ok hang on
people died testing the space equipment then we did it fine a few times then we had a problem and got worse at space travel for humans yes
this has been my argument the whole time we were good at space travel then we got worse
that is my argument lol
distance safety we got worse
whatever factor u wanna use its not as good anymore
how about we are worse at traveling to the moon now than we were in 1969 is that acceptable lol
alright boys
who thinks the earth is flat
bill do u think we are better today at human space travel or were we better at human space travel in 1969
i would hope that we are better today
ok how about human space travel when it comes to traveling to the moon are we better today or were we better in 1069
1969
strictly when it comes to human space travel to the moon are we better now or worse
i told u their is other factors than distance
well in the space race of the late 19th century, the US was in a major race against Soviet Russia to land their first man on the moon, and in the race, both nations likely ignored many safety factors in an effort to get to the moon faster
we could've been more efficient but a lot less safe
as of recent times, getting to the moon has become a prospect of little importance and so we have increased safety which in turn compromises efficiency
it depends on what factors you are debating
if we get hit with an asteroid like the one that took out the dinosaurs and humans get wiped out of the universe because we dont have a base on the moon its nasas fault lol
a base on the moon would definitely not be much of a help for human population
definitely not enough to restart the population as a whole
how many people would it take
100 ? 500 ?
yeah we prolly dont have the tech yet for a moonbase u need more gravity right
how do u know 100 years