I'm just pointing out the issues in peoples' arguments on both sides

Look at the observations yourself

Want Debate about the Anime instead?

because I'm not so attached to assume I'm right

Aww so your the Smart one April Respect

What peer reviewed globe material? @Xnetric

Lets see it

What your flat, let's see.

I'll show if you do 😉

https://peerj.com/articles/3544/

perhaps not the study flat earthers want, but it's a study proving the earth is flat and is indeed peer reviewed

again why it's bad to assume peer reviewed = correct, and that statistically significant = truth

Number 1. Peer reviewed science doesn't mean its fact

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

https://newrepublic.com/article/135921/science-suffering-peer-reviews-big-problems

I just said that lmao

if you want the "truth" from a scientific point of view you want multiple peer reviewed meta studies

and even then to look over it all yourself to ensure that the data matches your beliefs

Peer reviewed global material? I WANNA SEE IT

Also significance (p ≤ 0.05) is hardly replicable: at a good statistical power of 80%, two studies will be ‘conflicting’, meaning that one is significant and the other is not.

Lets see the reviews @Xnetric

This isn't saying anything in relation to the earth being flat WTF you on ahah

K i can see you have nothing. You just lied. Lol. Gnite

😂

Yup@. He got nuttin honey

Millions

Billions and billions

Becuz...” its sooo true”

https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-461945148/when-our-round-earth-was-first-measured

id also like to mention that this artcle was submitted and accepted on the same day bringing the review into question

Published
2017-06-14
Accepted
2017-06-14

It was also written by a orthinolgist

Hradly an expert on the earth Rather an expert on birds

Ok so, if people were to fall off the edge. Where it’s said to have nothing there right? So what creates that gravity that makes people fall off the edge? Because if the earth is flat, where’s the gravity off the edge/below it? Also how dense is this disk?

@JC_Daisy who told you there is an edge?

Lmao...what edge?

edge 'a muh thumb? <:lul:484994724118134784> ? . . .

ok so if the earth is flat then there would have to be an edge. explain how it wouldn't

infinite flat plane

or a dome

ok so explain the possibility of an infinite flat plane

you keep walking and it keeps going forever 🤷

it could also just loop around

for instance, going to the south pole and you just end up turned around or looped onto the other side

like the north pole or whatever

like an oldschool rpg map

pretty sure there's an end or edge somewhere
-- pretty sure there's no "physical possibilty" of a -> "physical infinite plane"

if i travel directly south i eventually come to a point where no matter what direction i move it is not south. now if i keep walking to this point and continue straight up toward the north in a straight line from where i came then i will get to a point where i can no longer go further north. for the sake of this being a starting point i have just gone around the entire world. so an infinite loop isn't possible as it means that there can be nothing beneath this flat plane so how can the southern cross exist or if it does then how is it only visible in the southern hemisphere

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ the globe belief is that space goes on forever infinitely

so I don't see why land infinitely is a stretch

but not "one-continuous-physical-object"

^ in sci-fi space model/theory

@Koro I'm not a flat earther. I'm just explaining there's multiple possibilities for lack of an edge

yeah

usually they believe that there's a dome

i did notice the simulation earther tag

and they're wrong - the ones that say infinite plane

aren't all flat earthers wrong tho

-- because, all physical "things" are made with physical limitations

infinity etc exists in spiritual and metaphysical

not in physical

unless we are allowed to eat from TheTreeOfLife
.

so what's outside of the dome

-- or unless there's something im missing but by all means do share

I can't conceive of a limited universe

it's either endless space or endless land

what part was hard to understand

"infinte space" model is not "one" continous PHYSICAL obejct
it might've suggested infinte amount of "worlds" or aka "planets" .. but ..not one continuous physical object or construct etc
.

maybe life's a mincraft map

ah I see what you mean

there can be infinite stuff but not something infinitely sized

not "physically infinite-sized" no

while I understand the claim I'm not sure I see evidence for it

its phyiscal fact

and, you're not gonna physically see evidence for it lol
.

I personally don't think that there's anything infinitely sized but I don't see why that can't be a possibility

especially if we ignore gravity

missed another part i said too? ..

?

```all physical "things" are made with physical limitations```

lol

k

that is physical-fact

what proof is there for that though

everything aka "physical" around you

take anything

EVERYthing physical has physical limitations

only way the aka "earth" could be "infinite" is it would haveto shfit or morph or ascend into higher FREQUENICES

and not "physical" dense frequencies

frequency of what

in other words, ..it would shift into SPIRITUAL or METAPHYSICAL > Frequencies

and but
nothing is truly "physical" anyhow, but eh ..we can save that topic for another day <:lul:484994724118134784>

frequencies of what tho

every time someone brings in frequencies they never explain what the medium is

everything is frequency, vibration etc,
Everything is Energy ✨

okay but vibrations of what

-- “If you want to know the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” - Nikola Tesla