but then the conspiracy goes and involves them

I'm serious though give me a peer-reviewed matrial that says teh earth is flat

pretty much anyone with sufficient access is going to be a multibillion dollar corp or a gov agency

Then how do you knwo it exists ?

I can access millions of peer-reviewed glovbe matrial...

so your argument is just flawed

you realize I'm not a flat earther, right?

You'r not... then what we arguing about here

@Xnetric not an argument

I'm just pointing out the issues in peoples' arguments on both sides

Look at the observations yourself

Want Debate about the Anime instead?

because I'm not so attached to assume I'm right

Aww so your the Smart one April Respect

What peer reviewed globe material? @Xnetric

Lets see it

What your flat, let's see.

I'll show if you do 😉

https://peerj.com/articles/3544/

perhaps not the study flat earthers want, but it's a study proving the earth is flat and is indeed peer reviewed

again why it's bad to assume peer reviewed = correct, and that statistically significant = truth

Number 1. Peer reviewed science doesn't mean its fact

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/

https://newrepublic.com/article/135921/science-suffering-peer-reviews-big-problems

I just said that lmao

if you want the "truth" from a scientific point of view you want multiple peer reviewed meta studies

and even then to look over it all yourself to ensure that the data matches your beliefs

Peer reviewed global material? I WANNA SEE IT

Also significance (p ≤ 0.05) is hardly replicable: at a good statistical power of 80%, two studies will be ‘conflicting’, meaning that one is significant and the other is not.

Lets see the reviews @Xnetric

This isn't saying anything in relation to the earth being flat WTF you on ahah

K i can see you have nothing. You just lied. Lol. Gnite

😂

Yup@. He got nuttin honey

Millions

Billions and billions

Becuz...” its sooo true”

https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-461945148/when-our-round-earth-was-first-measured