lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 3921/4068
| Next
you name calling shows how emotional you are ๐
ill pass
its not name calling. its just the truth. you think there is something that is real that isn't, that is delusional.
ditto
there was a video that is 5 min long that is pretty instructive
there's 500 years of science thats pretty instructive
talking about the horizon and if we lived on a ball it would be obvous
people have been arguing about flat vs ball for awhile
everyone agreed the earth was flat until about 100 years ago
so you thinking that this was settled 500 years shows how delusional you are
don't even know the actual history
even in the 1950's this was hotly debated
@Atlas the Friendly Robot There is nothing supporting any curvature or motions of earth. Every observation and test anyone does shows the opposite. No curvature can be found anywhere, and every test for motion shows zero.
im out. you dont know how to talk to people @^Kevin^
It is not like we live on a basketball. The earth is giagantic.
^
I'm not here coddling your delusions
heyy
Hi
this is about the horizon and if we lived on a ball what we would see, 5 min long (short)
thousands of proofs for flat earth and not one good proof of the globe
there is a reason why flat earth is a growing movement and people have been tricked but are waking up
ah yes, a 5 minute video will convince me that the earth is flat
truth backs flat earthers, not globe believers
flat earth is bigger than what we are told
in all my time, i have never seen evidence of globe nor flat earth that seems valid enough to not be contradictory and yet build a solid point. all "proofs" i have seen of both sides are easily debunked, and no side makes any sense due to the inaccuracy of their logic against the other side.
your math is wrong, it presumes the ball
assumption
he didnt even send it yet lol
^
@^Kevin^ you denied his evidence before even seeing it lolololololol
Kiwi why
I've seen it before
you think this is my first rodeo?
what is it ?
tell me the math he was about to say
any nonsense that talks about 24,901 miles in circumferance is wrong
you go by stereotypes and assumptions, being ignorant that its all wrong without even judging correctly.
what math says the earths shape?
ball math is bad math, its not reality
assumption
"ball math"
you like "flat math" more?
we measure for curvature and don't find any
On what ball? A football? Or a giagantic ball with a surface area of 510,072,000 square kilometers?
no curve = flat earth
ummmmm
<#484516084846952451> exists
curve is supposed to be 7.98 inches per mile squared, we can round that to 8 inches per mile squared, this is using the globe model
@Batcon So do the same with the calculator that is maintained by Mick West (globe earther) http://metabunk.org/curve Then you will see that there should be observable obstruction even at just 10 miles and 6 feet height.
So try it yourself.
@Batcon do you know much distance curvature that 1 degree of curvature is? thats a lot
Earth is quite small according to Heliocentrism. only 3958 miles is their assumption for the radius.
check the link kevin
8 inch per mile calculation is flawed since the earth is not a parabola
@Lain This is not 8 inch per mile. Just open the link and try instead
globe model says that we should have 66.6 feet of curvature in 10 miles
@Heider thats plain wrong. thats not in our model
notice the 666 showing up, free masons/satanists wrote up this gargage
trying to push their HELLocentric model
@Atlas the Friendly Robot What are you talking about?
666 is just human made up numbers
666 shows up alot in the globe nonsense
@Atlas the Friendly Robot What is not in your model?
You're going to have to prove the size of the earth for anyone to believe it
the earth only being 4000 miles
tilt is 24.4, or 66.6 degrees of tilt of earth.
666 is human made up contruct
its meaningless outside of humans
@Atlas the Friendly Robot Lol. So what do you think is the assumed radius then? ๐ 3958 miles is the official number.
people went around antartica and determined that it was bigger than 24,901 miles.
@Heider not its not, where are you getting that info?
Prove the size @Atlas the Friendly Robot
explorers spent years trying to circumnavigate antartica
@Atlas the Friendly Robot So what do you think it is?
some of those explorers died
im asking where did you get that number from
@Batcon the 1 degree of curvature that you should see in distance is a lot, how much is it? you're making it look less when you're using degrees which is deceitful
believe captain cook was one of them
@Atlas the Friendly Robot From everywhere. Universities, encyclopedias.. even wiki
So what do you think it is?
send links @Heider
they got the radius number wrong
radius....... @Heider
Eratosthenes didn't prove anything, he said stuff that no one believed
i though you meant circumfrence nvm
But i said radius all the time?
at least in regard to the shape of the earth
also
thats 8,000 in diameter.... thats really big @Heider
majority of people were flat earthers and remain flat earthers up until recently
no
where do you guy's info come from lol
@Atlas the Friendly Robot So open https://metabunk.org/curve enter 10 miles in distance and 6 feet in height. And observe how much should be hidden by this fairytale curvature that you believe in. Then you can go out and observe that its not there.
im trying to say you are using degree to calculate how much curvature there should be when the earth is huge which is deceitful. 1 degree of a 25k mile circumference is a lot. im asking how much drop of curvature in distance should you see every x miles which would be more genuine.
^^^^^^^^^
everyone click this link
suffice it to say that history is not accurate
people in power decide what is history, and most of it is skewed
thats kinda true
but not to your extent
@Batcon got em !
people can change the size of the sun to move the sun wherever they want, this isn't science, its pseudoscience
massage the numbers to push the sun at 104 million miles away
@Atlas the Friendly Robot he uses the Radius in his equations. That is an assumed value. What about proving it first?
They assumed a curvature and then observed light and shadows to then assume the radius.
whats wrong with assumed values. FE's always use assumed values
copernicus and others tried to convince people the earth wasn't flat, but people were not convinced until recently with radio, TV, and other stuff.
@Atlas the Friendly Robot Because its not proven. You are trying to prove the ball, and then you are presupposing that its a ball and also assuming that you know its real radius.. Its all just assumptions.. or Faith..
this is a 1927 image of the video of the plane going around the earth, propaganda for the globe
@Heider ditto
@Heider i think its more deceitful when they use degree to prove '' x distance of y degree of curvature '' instead of '' x distanace of y distance of curvature ''
globe belief is a religion
@Atlas the Friendly Robot No. You were the one using a begging the question fallacy. You were trying to prove that it is a ball. and to do that, you used this article that have already Pressuposed it to be a ball. So you assume it to be a ball to prove that its a ball. Begging the question fallacy.
I said he was going to do that with his ball math from the get go
the proof you guys send pressuposes that the earth is flat... whats your point ? @Heider
just becauses you have people arguing in the comments doesn't prove him wrong
^^^
@Atlas the Friendly Robot What proofs have i sent? Great red herring. But i guess you now understand that your link was using logical fallacies.
unless you have some proofs for the curvature and then the radius hidden away somewhere.
red herring, fallacies, burden of proof... im really starting to hate these words lol
you guys lean on them too much
this comment in the video kind of shows what I'm saying is true, backs me up
Hoi
Your comeback was to say "what you guys bring", i havent brought anything except pointing out the assumptions that you believe in.
hoi
Ohno a company uses a globe as a logo , thats totally propaganda for the shape of the earth
so I'm not getting the proven wrong vibe from looking at the comments
hoe
you can talk to old people and ask them if globe vs flat earth was a thing back in the 1950's
@Heider lol... now my comeback is, wait for it .... k
and what settled it, people stopped arguing about it when the moon landing supposedly happened, people were tricked
Does this mean that the guys that use a mountain as a logo use it to spread mountain propaganda?
Are mountains not real?
mountain dew works for the government ???
@^Kevin^ boomers believe in moon landings to death, its their pride. its gen x y and some millenials that deny it
^^^^^
Mountains are fake confirmed
@Atlas the Friendly Robot But then again, your comment had nothing to do with me. So it was a red herring to the discussion we were having:
the problem is that the moon landings are not standing up to the test of time, too much fakery
boomers were raised being told that they were the greatest generation
there is curvature but they are using the wrong formula to calcuate it
@Heider you rather talk about herrings than to prove the shape of the earth... ill pass
You were the one derailing the convo. So great projection.
Millenials just get shittted om
its been derailed long ago. you guys are experts at that
how can the earth be flat when there are hills and mountains? BOOM
lol
Ive never seen a mountain
They are a haox
me neither
@Atlas the Friendly Robot Just empty assertions. So do you have any proofs for the curvature? or is it just faith?
i think they're fake tbh
the mountains haven't loaded yet until we see them. everyone is just faking that they saw them
i need to turn up my render distance i guess
The netherlands doesnt have mountains
Therefore they arent real
basically this shows that we didn't land on the moon, comments are very damaging
@^Kevin^ thatโs a good video. ๐
Hello sister Gwench
Hoi
that professor might be saying we actually went there, think that professor is clueless
you know they make movies about space too .....
listening to his closing comments professor says we should go back there.
We are
2024 r smt
people are going to fake it better, but still faking it
tech is better, so they can fake it better
thats broken logic
its what is happening, very logical
they faked it 50 years ago, they will fake it again
oh well if you say so ..
just like they faked the lunar module running around mars
they had multiple light sources
You know that it would be impossible to fake the moon landing back then.
For the question of the day, absolutely. Pesticides have been a major issue for several insect populations.
they had plenty of camera tricks back then
name some @^Kevin^
You canโt stimulate parallel rays without either a laser or an incredibly bright and distant source
they slowed down the video by 1/2 to fake the 1/8th or 1/4th gravity, but if you 2x the video of the moon landings it shows that they are still in normal gravity
lolol
you can tell the astronots are on wires/harnesses, and that in some of the video those wires are still visible
i cant tell
they got me good lol
In what videos? Link?
they stand from a kneeling position that wouldn't be possible if they weren't on wires/harness
Example please?
globe busters spent a year breaking down everything NASA moon landings did
they spent a full year in youtube videos breaking it down
no @Batcon he just finds a new argument
Man only if there was a giant super power that followed the whole moonlanding with telescopes and wouldve definitely called the usa out if they had faked it
Oh wait
Make a summation because Iโm not gonna spend hours just to get through a single video
that article you posted is garbage
@The_chickenmaster Russia.
Flearthers have a bad habit of not getting to the point
@Orestis that was indeed the joke
At least from what Iโve seen
the point is we live on flat earth and your belief is delusional
that is the point
and globebusters isnt just another yt channel trying to make money ? @^Kevin^
@The_chickenmaster I know.
You know, I remember something from a while back
I skimmed it, I've already looked at it before
If we lived on a planar disc-like structure, regardless of size, we would always observe the sun rising and setting to the north
@Batcon right !
keep those in your notes lol
the people making the serious money are the space liars who push the lies about space that isn't real
NASA is making 21 billion + this year
@^Kevin^ send links
people selling going to space nonsense make a mint
send links about what?
you aren't reading my links, why should I bother
anyone that gets paid millions is lying ? lol
go look at the funny thing happened on the way to the moon, shows all the fakery going on with the moon
NASA funding rn compared to the past is pretty low
Js
send nasa budget link .
well, some of the fakery
they made 21 billion ? i didnt know that
you cannot google that?
In 2016, the US military's budget was about $580 billion more than NASA's.
How much do they spend on army
Too much
How much do they spend on education
Elon Muskโs growing empire is fueled by $4.9 billion in government subsidies
@The_chickenmaster they have to play world police
army makes like 500 billion... are they lying too ?? @^Kevin^
Elon Musk isnโt your friend btw, no billionaire is
This discord is proof that they clearly dont spend enough on education
so Elon musk FAKE X is gov't sponsored lies also
100% of the time they have ulterior motives
look, are you deflecting much talking about the army?
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 3921/4068
| Next