Message from @^Kevin^
Discord ID: 641296586814521345
no
where do you guy's info come from lol
@Atlas the Friendly Robot So open https://metabunk.org/curve enter 10 miles in distance and 6 feet in height. And observe how much should be hidden by this fairytale curvature that you believe in. Then you can go out and observe that its not there.
im trying to say you are using degree to calculate how much curvature there should be when the earth is huge which is deceitful. 1 degree of a 25k mile circumference is a lot. im asking how much drop of curvature in distance should you see every x miles which would be more genuine.
^^^^^^^^^
everyone click this link
suffice it to say that history is not accurate
people in power decide what is history, and most of it is skewed
thats kinda true
but not to your extent
@Batcon got em !
people can change the size of the sun to move the sun wherever they want, this isn't science, its pseudoscience
massage the numbers to push the sun at 104 million miles away
@Atlas the Friendly Robot he uses the Radius in his equations. That is an assumed value. What about proving it first?
They assumed a curvature and then observed light and shadows to then assume the radius.
whats wrong with assumed values. FE's always use assumed values
copernicus and others tried to convince people the earth wasn't flat, but people were not convinced until recently with radio, TV, and other stuff.
@Atlas the Friendly Robot Because its not proven. You are trying to prove the ball, and then you are presupposing that its a ball and also assuming that you know its real radius.. Its all just assumptions.. or Faith..
this is a 1927 image of the video of the plane going around the earth, propaganda for the globe
@Heider ditto
@Heider i think its more deceitful when they use degree to prove '' x distance of y degree of curvature '' instead of '' x distanace of y distance of curvature ''
globe belief is a religion
@Atlas the Friendly Robot No. You were the one using a begging the question fallacy. You were trying to prove that it is a ball. and to do that, you used this article that have already Pressuposed it to be a ball. So you assume it to be a ball to prove that its a ball. Begging the question fallacy.
I said he was going to do that with his ball math from the get go
the proof you guys send pressuposes that the earth is flat... whats your point ? @Heider
just becauses you have people arguing in the comments doesn't prove him wrong
^^^
@Atlas the Friendly Robot What proofs have i sent? Great red herring. But i guess you now understand that your link was using logical fallacies.
unless you have some proofs for the curvature and then the radius hidden away somewhere.
red herring, fallacies, burden of proof... im really starting to hate these words lol
you guys lean on them too much
this comment in the video kind of shows what I'm saying is true, backs me up
Hoi
Your comeback was to say "what you guys bring", i havent brought anything except pointing out the assumptions that you believe in.
hoi