Message from @^Kevin^
Discord ID: 641294895935520818
@Heider not its not, where are you getting that info?
Prove the size @Atlas the Friendly Robot
explorers spent years trying to circumnavigate antartica
@Atlas the Friendly Robot So what do you think it is?
some of those explorers died
im asking where did you get that number from
@Batcon the 1 degree of curvature that you should see in distance is a lot, how much is it? you're making it look less when you're using degrees which is deceitful
believe captain cook was one of them
@Atlas the Friendly Robot From everywhere. Universities, encyclopedias.. even wiki
So what do you think it is?
send links @Heider
they got the radius number wrong
radius....... @Heider
Eratosthenes didn't prove anything, he said stuff that no one believed
i though you meant circumfrence nvm
But i said radius all the time?
at least in regard to the shape of the earth
also
thats 8,000 in diameter.... thats really big @Heider
no
where do you guy's info come from lol
@Atlas the Friendly Robot So open https://metabunk.org/curve enter 10 miles in distance and 6 feet in height. And observe how much should be hidden by this fairytale curvature that you believe in. Then you can go out and observe that its not there.
im trying to say you are using degree to calculate how much curvature there should be when the earth is huge which is deceitful. 1 degree of a 25k mile circumference is a lot. im asking how much drop of curvature in distance should you see every x miles which would be more genuine.
^^^^^^^^^
everyone click this link
suffice it to say that history is not accurate
people in power decide what is history, and most of it is skewed
thats kinda true
but not to your extent
@Batcon got em !
people can change the size of the sun to move the sun wherever they want, this isn't science, its pseudoscience
massage the numbers to push the sun at 104 million miles away
@Atlas the Friendly Robot he uses the Radius in his equations. That is an assumed value. What about proving it first?
They assumed a curvature and then observed light and shadows to then assume the radius.
whats wrong with assumed values. FE's always use assumed values