lounge

Discord ID: 484514023698726912


1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 1582/4068 | Next

2019-05-01 14:52:15 UTC

that is the weird part

2019-05-01 14:52:25 UTC

double slit experiment

2019-05-01 14:52:44 UTC

if we observe the light its one way and if we dont observe its another way

2019-05-01 14:52:48 UTC

Well I think it was Einstein who started to theorize about the one way speed of light. But itโ€™s the quintessential catch 22 since in order to test the one way speed of light you have to know the one way speed of light

2019-05-01 14:52:50 UTC

i think thats how it worked

2019-05-01 14:53:03 UTC

There is also this movie showing something weird happening in the horizon https://youtu.be/_uyFC-Tgnz0

2019-05-01 14:54:19 UTC

@jeremy when itโ€™s tested as a particle itโ€™s a particle. When itโ€™s tested as a wave itโ€™s a wave

2019-05-01 14:54:55 UTC

i think it has to do with if we observe it or not

2019-05-01 14:55:11 UTC

if we look its one way if we dont look its another way

2019-05-01 14:56:03 UTC

i was talkin about the double slit experiment

2019-05-01 14:56:35 UTC

Double slit is often misinterpreted

2019-05-01 14:57:09 UTC

Have to be careful with that one

2019-05-01 14:57:57 UTC

well isnt it if we observe the light or observe the results its one way and if we dont its the other way ?

2019-05-01 14:58:11 UTC

i know it has something to do with us observing somehow

2019-05-01 14:58:25 UTC

us observing changes the result in the same way everytime

2019-05-01 14:58:41 UTC

No. If itโ€™s actively tested as a wave it shows up as a wave. If itโ€™s actively tested as a particle then itโ€™s a particle

2019-05-01 14:58:54 UTC

u sure?

2019-05-01 14:59:06 UTC

i thought it had to do with us observing

2019-05-01 14:59:33 UTC

I honk youโ€™re thinking of some sort of schroedingers cat scenario

2019-05-01 14:59:37 UTC

na

2019-05-01 14:59:41 UTC

My Cat has passed the test to be a cat

2019-05-01 14:59:43 UTC

Basically, according to double slit, if anything interacts with an event (and observing is considered an interaction), that event will fundamentally change in some way.

2019-05-01 14:59:55 UTC

not the stupid cat thing that makes as much sense as infinite monkeys on infinite typewriters

2019-05-01 15:00:12 UTC

A cat that knocks the front door

2019-05-01 15:00:29 UTC

so the double slit is specifically if we observe it changes the form light takes

2019-05-01 15:00:44 UTC

so when we dont look its one way and when we do look its the other way

2019-05-01 15:01:11 UTC

I think that sort of stuff states that if you donโ€™t observe itโ€™s just kind of up in the air

2019-05-01 15:01:13 UTC

Double slit doesnโ€™t have to do with light specifically

2019-05-01 15:01:15 UTC

Like itโ€™s neither

2019-05-01 15:01:24 UTC

idk

2019-05-01 15:01:34 UTC

im more interested int he boats going over the curve or not lol

2019-05-01 15:01:52 UTC

u guys got photoshop ?

2019-05-01 15:01:54 UTC

Thatโ€™s Schroedingerโ€™s cat, Red

2019-05-01 15:02:12 UTC

Oof

2019-05-01 15:02:19 UTC

Double slit just states that the act of observing must change the event being observed

2019-05-01 15:02:21 UTC

I slept through all my classes but history

2019-05-01 15:03:24 UTC

so light is either a particle or wave depending on if we observe it or not ok

2019-05-01 15:03:31 UTC

thats what i thought

2019-05-01 15:03:33 UTC

Apparently people have done the double slit experiment and gotten the same results with C60, aka buckminsterfullerene. That's 60 carbon atoms!

2019-05-01 15:04:00 UTC

Per molecule

2019-05-01 15:04:24 UTC

idk what that means

2019-05-01 15:05:06 UTC

I think we should perhaps look more into the medium light is travelling through rather than light itself

2019-05-01 15:05:16 UTC

The earth is flat

2019-05-01 15:05:35 UTC

But my b*tch aint

2019-05-01 15:05:45 UTC

@floridaswamptrash Iโ€™m happy for you

2019-05-01 15:06:18 UTC

Thanks man

2019-05-01 15:07:13 UTC

Well the interference patterns observed from the double slit experiment show that light and electrons experience wave/particle duality. This can be calculated with the schrodinger equation. Basically the less mass a particle has, the less likely you will be to predict its location.

2019-05-01 15:07:20 UTC

C60 has a lot of mass

2019-05-01 15:10:26 UTC

i dont believe in that shrodingers cat thing

2019-05-01 15:10:42 UTC

thats a theory right ?

2019-05-01 15:12:02 UTC

or is that even science sounded more like philosophy when i heard it

2019-05-01 15:17:49 UTC

Apparently Schrodinger's cat is a thought experiment Schrodinger came up with to explain how silly super position is. (a particle being in both states at the same time).

2019-05-01 15:18:17 UTC

I think he then realised that he couldn't actually disprove it.

2019-05-01 15:22:53 UTC

yeah schrodingers cat isnt falsifiable

2019-05-01 15:24:23 UTC

in the experiment schrodinger's cat is both dead and alive at the same time

2019-05-01 15:24:51 UTC

It's not really a theory itself, more of a predictive model. The schrodinger equations form the basis of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), the current scientific consensus for the behaviour of the electromagnetic force. In fact, I don't think there's really a quantum theory that doesn't involve the schrodinger equations in some way.

2019-05-01 15:24:57 UTC

Don't quote me on that though.

2019-05-01 15:27:27 UTC

i thought it was his interpretation of quantum physics or something

2019-05-01 15:28:30 UTC

nvm i searched up on google and i got this

2019-05-01 15:28:34 UTC

โ€œSchrรถdinger's cat is a thought experiment about quantum physics. Erwin Schrรถdinger suggested it in 1935, in reaction to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics.โ€

2019-05-01 15:29:57 UTC

It's as important to quantum mechanics as F=ma is to Newtonian physics

2019-05-01 15:30:11 UTC

Apparently anyway.

2019-05-01 15:31:01 UTC

i dont really know anything about quantum physics i just read about it

2019-05-01 15:31:23 UTC

like i just read about string theory because i think its awesome

2019-05-01 15:31:41 UTC

Same, but it pisses me off when I read it

2019-05-01 15:31:53 UTC

Because it doesn't make sense

2019-05-01 15:32:07 UTC

Or its counter intuitive

2019-05-01 15:32:31 UTC

id imagine it does when you have it explained by a professor

2019-05-01 15:33:13 UTC

because things online arenโ€™t always explained in the best ways

2019-05-01 15:33:46 UTC

Yeah, but it really doesn't make sense some times.

2019-05-01 15:34:09 UTC

Like, I understand what they say, but it just doesn't seem logical.

2019-05-01 15:34:12 UTC

yeah i find string theory and the fractal dimension very confusing

2019-05-01 15:36:19 UTC

and then string theory also ties in to M theory which i dont even know what that is at the moment

2019-05-01 15:38:08 UTC

but imo quantum physics is to complex for me to become a quantum physicist so im just gonna stick to software engineering

2019-05-01 15:39:14 UTC

The problem I have is; we've reached a point in physics where it's really difficult to actually observe things accurately for what they are. We have to come up with complicated mathematics that involve a ton of probability.

When you apply that math to reality, strange things happen. Because it's not supposed to be reality, just predict it. But there's no choice but to apply the math to reality.

2019-05-01 15:39:41 UTC

But the thing is, we actually do observe some really weird things sometimes.

2019-05-01 15:40:46 UTC

theres more than one way to look at something

2019-05-01 15:40:59 UTC

oh short and snappy look how cool i am

2019-05-01 15:41:57 UTC

i think quantum physics is the only thing thats truly random because you can do one thing and get one result then do the same exact thing and get another

2019-05-01 15:42:12 UTC

I think string theory was designed to be as mathematically accurate as possible. Mathematically accurate doesn't mean realistic...

2019-05-01 15:42:36 UTC

i mean

2019-05-01 15:42:39 UTC

string theory is supposed to be the โ€œtheory of everythingโ€

2019-05-01 15:42:40 UTC

Things are only random to us if we don't know how they work.

2019-05-01 15:42:45 UTC

they are called theory for a reason

2019-05-01 15:44:17 UTC

@Wardak โ€œA scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can be repeatedly tested and verified in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of resultsโ€

2019-05-01 15:44:34 UTC

yeah

2019-05-01 15:45:14 UTC

as long as they are considered theorems then there is a possibility a scientist many years in the future would debunk it

2019-05-01 15:45:27 UTC

generally

2019-05-01 15:46:08 UTC

unlike a scientific law a theory actually explains how something works scientific laws only explain the phenomenon

2019-05-01 15:46:31 UTC

or tries to

2019-05-01 15:46:42 UTC

like gravity we know it exists but we dont know how it works therefore making it a law

2019-05-01 15:47:23 UTC

i believe theories are held higher in science than laws but dont quote me on that im not sure how true that is

2019-05-01 15:47:41 UTC

regardless about that comparison

2019-05-01 15:47:53 UTC

theories can be disproven

2019-05-01 15:48:04 UTC

with greater technology and discoveries

2019-05-01 15:48:12 UTC

and new theories introduced

2019-05-01 15:48:39 UTC

not all though

2019-05-01 15:48:59 UTC

of course there are some theories right now that are so accurate that there probably isnt another explanation

2019-05-01 15:49:16 UTC

Which theory of gravity do you believe in?

2019-05-01 15:49:21 UTC

the thing is theories arnt wrong because theories are supposed to be able to be repeated

2019-05-01 15:49:33 UTC

personally i dont care about gravity

2019-05-01 15:49:36 UTC

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Wardak has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

2019-05-01 15:49:42 UTC

i dont believe sht

2019-05-01 15:49:57 UTC

and its not something personally worth researching into unless i need to

2019-05-01 15:51:14 UTC

@eletrick33 even if theories show high repeatability they can be disprove i guess

2019-05-01 15:51:17 UTC

the way i think it

2019-05-01 15:51:40 UTC

Say that too loudly and you might float away ๐Ÿ™„

2019-05-01 15:51:51 UTC

in the case that a theory is disproven then i would imagine that it would be changed or removed

2019-05-01 15:51:51 UTC

wdym

2019-05-01 15:52:24 UTC

all i need to know about gravity is for my maths calculations

2019-05-01 15:52:28 UTC

i think hes saying that with out gravity we would float away

2019-05-01 15:52:33 UTC

the 9.8ms-2 accel

2019-05-01 15:52:54 UTC

but i think would just fly off the earth because of how fast were moving

2019-05-01 15:53:10 UTC

but idk

2019-05-01 15:53:15 UTC

yh but why would gravity stop

2019-05-01 15:53:26 UTC

or exhibit no force

2019-05-01 15:53:31 UTC

It was a joke

2019-05-01 15:53:46 UTC

say somethign funny

2019-05-01 15:53:49 UTC

make me laugh

2019-05-01 15:53:50 UTC

kid

2019-05-01 15:53:51 UTC

KID#

2019-05-01 15:53:51 UTC

if gravity just stopped we would all be screwed

2019-05-01 15:53:53 UTC

ok

2019-05-01 15:53:55 UTC

i got you

2019-05-01 15:54:05 UTC

make a FUNNY joke

2019-05-01 15:54:09 UTC

people arnt actually blind they just have their render distance set to 0

2019-05-01 15:54:13 UTC

LOL

2019-05-01 15:54:20 UTC

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Wardak has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

2019-05-01 15:54:24 UTC

minecraft joke

2019-05-01 15:54:29 UTC

made me commit swearing sin

2019-05-01 15:54:30 UTC

sorry jesus

2019-05-01 15:55:02 UTC

i gtg class time

2019-05-01 15:55:14 UTC

zzz

2019-05-01 16:18:21 UTC

I like gravity

2019-05-01 16:18:26 UTC

Itโ€™s pretty neat

2019-05-01 16:21:12 UTC

Whatโ€™s the average age on this server?

2019-05-01 16:21:13 UTC

If you like gravity try out buoyancy

2019-05-01 16:21:16 UTC

Shes hotter

2019-05-01 16:21:18 UTC

FLAT EARTH SHIPS DISAPPEAR HULL FIRST: https://imgur.com/aUtqGyq

2019-05-01 16:21:21 UTC

99

2019-05-01 16:21:46 UTC

CAPITAL LETTERS

2019-05-01 16:36:39 UTC

that could be ships disappearing on a flat earth

2019-05-01 16:38:14 UTC

Eem

2019-05-01 16:38:17 UTC

Hello

2019-05-01 16:47:00 UTC

Hey

2019-05-01 16:50:29 UTC

How are you?

2019-05-01 16:53:22 UTC

The reason people believe earth is flat is because theres no apparent curve, well that's because the size of the earth is **so** large, that it *appears* flat because it's not small enough for you to see the curve

2019-05-01 16:53:40 UTC

except when you see a ship go over it?

2019-05-01 16:53:55 UTC

then suddenly it's small enough

2019-05-01 16:54:45 UTC

Your eyes can see the ship much better then a slight decline.

2019-05-01 16:54:51 UTC

I'm good my nuggle @Aiden {EMT}

2019-05-01 16:55:20 UTC

Great

2019-05-01 16:55:54 UTC

great.. so even though the earth is so massive

2019-05-01 16:56:04 UTC

we can still see a ship go over the curve

2019-05-01 16:56:19 UTC

It's because our vision is like straightforward and not left to right

2019-05-01 16:56:30 UTC

@carlito hey, give me 1 link of solid proof of flat earth

2019-05-01 16:56:59 UTC

If you have not researched it then perhaps you've got some way to go @Cake B0i

2019-05-01 16:57:15 UTC

@carlito give me a link.

2019-05-01 16:57:32 UTC

Some sort of evidence

2019-05-01 16:57:33 UTC

How can you even prove someone has done research

2019-05-01 16:57:36 UTC

I mean

2019-05-01 16:57:40 UTC

It's easy to say

2019-05-01 16:57:43 UTC

@Cake B0i So there's no curve then, that means Earth's flat

2019-05-01 16:57:47 UTC

'do your research'

2019-05-01 16:57:53 UTC

But then if they do and come back

2019-05-01 16:57:58 UTC

How do you even judge if they did

2019-05-01 16:58:15 UTC

Same goes for yourself, how can you prove to others that you yourself has done the necessary research

2019-05-01 16:58:20 UTC

@Human Sheeple since the earth is flat, what's at the edge?

2019-05-01 16:58:22 UTC

Other than spamming links.

2019-05-01 16:58:30 UTC

@Cake B0i Your feet

2019-05-01 16:58:32 UTC

good point @Aiden {EMT}

2019-05-01 16:59:05 UTC

Unless you're sat on the floor with your feet in the air doing weird yoga stuff, then it's your ass that's at the edge

2019-05-01 16:59:26 UTC

and anyone that thinks that 'one link' will change it all, well then there's something up with that logic

2019-05-01 16:59:31 UTC

Hah, just as I thought. Flat earthers always start bluffing and saying "Your just a troll" whenever I ask for proof

2019-05-01 16:59:44 UTC

Let's not jump to conclusions and accusations

2019-05-01 16:59:52 UTC

Yeah there's your proof

2019-05-01 17:00:13 UTC

...

2019-05-01 17:00:25 UTC

Nice.. let's see if that converts him

2019-05-01 17:00:35 UTC

Let me just ask you to not mock any party within this discussion

2019-05-01 17:00:49 UTC

Even though it seems hard to not do so

2019-05-01 17:01:07 UTC

It's pretty difficult not to mock the globe earth theory

2019-05-01 17:01:13 UTC

it's so ridiculous

2019-05-01 17:01:24 UTC

*facepalm* oh my ***FUCKING*** god. The size of the earth makes that level.

2019-05-01 17:01:27 UTC

but i'll try not to mock okay

2019-05-01 17:02:09 UTC

It makes it hard not to mock both parties for being childish and irrational within heated discussions

2019-05-01 17:02:42 UTC

well, we all know which camp started the childishness now don't we

2019-05-01 17:02:54 UTC

The earth is flat

2019-05-01 17:02:59 UTC

But my b*tch aint

2019-05-01 17:03:03 UTC

As I rarely see both parties resolving their issues peacefully and with solid proof without the other party bombarding them with insults.

2019-05-01 17:04:44 UTC

i mean

2019-05-01 17:04:50 UTC

the earth is flat and round

2019-05-01 17:05:02 UTC

we've been beaten into submission with childishness

2019-05-01 17:05:15 UTC

checkmate 100

2019-05-01 17:05:32 UTC

yes, yes yes!!.. flat and round is most likely

2019-05-01 17:05:40 UTC

two in one

2019-05-01 17:05:41 UTC

win win

2019-05-01 17:05:44 UTC

no ones wrong

2019-05-01 17:05:46 UTC

best ending

2019-05-01 17:05:48 UTC

Bagel shape

2019-05-01 17:05:51 UTC

not really

2019-05-01 17:05:55 UTC

shut the fuk up

2019-05-01 17:05:56 UTC

dont

2019-05-01 17:05:58 UTC

not really

2019-05-01 17:05:58 UTC

me

2019-05-01 17:05:59 UTC

you noob

2019-05-01 17:06:05 UTC

because there's still those that believe in spherical shape

2019-05-01 17:06:09 UTC

what about them

2019-05-01 17:06:14 UTC

checkmate who?

2019-05-01 17:06:27 UTC

round does not equal spherical

2019-05-01 17:06:29 UTC

is your plate spherical?

2019-05-01 17:06:36 UTC

the plate you eat from?

2019-05-01 17:06:42 UTC

you type too much

2019-05-01 17:06:48 UTC

So what

2019-05-01 17:06:49 UTC

and what are you tryna go to

2019-05-01 17:06:53 UTC

Let them be

2019-05-01 17:06:53 UTC

SO WHAT

2019-05-01 17:06:55 UTC

SO WHAAAAT

2019-05-01 17:06:58 UTC

YOU KNOW IM RICHER THAN U

2019-05-01 17:07:11 UTC

I wouldn't have the slighest

2019-05-01 17:07:20 UTC

right

2019-05-01 17:07:24 UTC

it sa christian server

2019-05-01 17:07:25 UTC

As to how you would know...

2019-05-01 17:07:27 UTC

says he typing & typing & typing away ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

2019-05-01 17:07:27 UTC

what do u lsiten to

2019-05-01 17:07:30 UTC

mozart

2019-05-01 17:07:41 UTC

Uh not always

2019-05-01 17:08:17 UTC

what's mozart?

2019-05-01 17:08:28 UTC

uh dont worry

2019-05-01 17:08:30 UTC

Anyway I don't understand what the meaning of this conversation is

2019-05-01 17:08:32 UTC

hes a bloody globe earther

2019-05-01 17:08:48 UTC

Like... 90% of the world population

2019-05-01 17:08:55 UTC

those degens cant believe they live in sucha life where they are brainwashed to believe that the world is spherical

2019-05-01 17:09:03 UTC

look if i get my telescope over here

2019-05-01 17:09:05 UTC

i can seee

2019-05-01 17:09:07 UTC

mount everest

2019-05-01 17:09:09 UTC

still typing?

2019-05-01 17:09:10 UTC

Including most of the Greek philosophers, most politicians...

2019-05-01 17:09:25 UTC

you beating my a$$ with typing man

2019-05-01 17:09:32 UTC

say it with ur chest

2019-05-01 17:09:34 UTC

dont use ^

2019-05-01 17:09:38 UTC

$

2019-05-01 17:09:38 UTC

2019-05-01 17:09:43 UTC

I uhm

1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev | Page 1582/4068 | Next