politits
Discord ID: 274375742433787904
2,140 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/9
| Next
Is this the one with the "100,00 national guard!!!" claim?
The one that was fake to dig out the rat?
And as always
it's the fucking illegal immigrants being removed
not the people here legally
those that are here *illegally*
The ones that have no right being here
So fucking good, hopefully it'll get done fast if it's true
the only time shoplifting is ok if it's in the grocery store and you shoplift 1-5 grapes from the plastic thing holding the grapes
a group of liberals (or in this instance, libtards) were talking about how Trump is fucking over our veterans
I asked if they'd ever served
they said no
so I went and asked my friend Bradley, who was formerly in the U.S. Army
I asked if he felt fucked over by Trump
he said that between the countless number of things Trump is doing in favor of our veterans, including VA benefits, and even appointing Mattis as SecDef, nobody in the military hates him.
They actually love him.
Pisses me the fuck off when civilians act like they know what it's like to be in the service.
Pisses me off even more when they speak on behalf of actual service members
Yeah all I've ever heard from them is they love him
Which is why the notion of a democrat-lead military coup is pants-on-head buttfuck retarded
No, let it happen
it's an amazing idea
it's called natural selection
The only people rioting will be the libs themselves, no one else is going to be joining them, because that group is 100% filled with people who have no common sense.
Nevertheless they are extremely violent, and we should be at least a little worried, considering the fact that they are willing to attempt to murder someone based on their political views.
As has been proven by most of the recent things they have been doing.
But yeah, on the previous topic one of the most annoying things they do is get offended for other people
or speak out against things they have no knowledge on, like guns or how Trump is treating the military
The democratic "protest" during Trump's speech was disgusting
They all wore white, and refused to stand for anything he said
including when he gave a standing ovation to the wife of the fallen navy seal
some of the democrats were playing games on their phones
Yeah, there's no other way to describe it besides disgusting
http://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4011197
"Trump signs new travel ban executive order"
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/us/politics/travel-ban-muslim-trump.amp.html
"Trump's New Travel Ban Blocks Migrants From Six Nations, Sparing Iraq"
Who the fuck wants to go to afghanistan
also
it's not about going there... it's about people there to go in the US...
thats on the topic that those country's are denying american visas and shit
Ik
Ik
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-citizen-manpreet-kooner-denied-entry-to-united-states/amp
"'You're being Trumped': Canadian citizen says she was denied entry to US and told she would need a visa"
lmao at the "canadians" being denied
Heil Hitler.
Heil mein Fรผhrer!
<:Hitler:230297580477612032>
hail the ss
<:heman:265778823579041792>
Nazi mods.
tax forms out... I don't know what this translates to or means, but go ahead
Trump's tax stuff
if anyone can make heads-or-tails of what this "exclusive scoop" from MSNBC means... lemme know
nvm, it's mainly irrelevant
Apparently it proves again he did nothing wrong
wow, y'sure seem to love that pic I shared
https://www.thestar.com/amp/news/world/2017/03/16/trumps-revised-travel-ban-suffers-second-setback-after-maryland-judge-blocks-it.html
"Trump's revised travel ban suffers second setback after Maryland judge blocks it"
we need more sacrifical lambs like the UK with their brexit for the euro skepticals
no minister-president wilders <:FeelsWeirdMan:291572214967435265>
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-angela-merkel-shake-hand-refuse-a7635911.html
Didn't you boys get upset when Trudeau didn't shake hands properly?
Trudeau did shake hands properly though, it was straight up bad propoganda when people reported he didn't or he hesitated
Which is why I'm skeptical of this now already
What, that he refused to shake Merkel's hand?
Yes
But he did?
There's a clip in the article I posted that shows it
Yes, I'm curious about what happened and why it happened, instead of simply going into autist screeching mode about how he didn't shake Merkel's hand
And I don't trust the Independent to tell me that
What happened is that he refused to shake her hand, even after she asked personally
I can source other publications if you wish
Homu H. - Today at 4:28 PM
Yes, I'm curious about what happened and why it happened, instead of simply going into autist screeching mode about how he didn't shake Merkel's hand
And I don't trust the Independent to tell me that
I don't know if anyone besides Trump himself can say why it happened
*@Homu H. - Today at 12:28 AM from <#274375742433787904>*
```Yes, I'm curious about what happened and why it happened, instead of simply going into autist screeching mode about how he didn't shake Merkel's hand
And I don't trust the Independent to tell me that
```
^ mine is better
I have Quote Plugin Bitches
๐
Even after a weed,i dont get that thing
"convenient'
paint life matters
Snipping Tool lives matter
๐ค
lol homu, the article isn't about how trump never shaked merkel's hand...
I wouldn't shake her hand either ๐
heheh
same tbh
Nazi
๐ ฑ๏ธazi
<:Hitler:230297580477612032>
^Ye just saw that on the news today
Kind of a dick move, but then again it's more safer now
Notice how divided the human race is
We all hate each other
hewillnotdevideus
Then we look to the stars for a greater entity to save us from ourselves
Why the fuck saudi arabia cant wear them,they are not responsable for things that happend.
*@Tech Talk - Today at 10:05 PM from <#274375742433787904>*
```Notice how divided the human race is
We all hate each other
```
I agree
*@DevilSnake74 - Today at 10:09 PM from <#274375742433787904>*
```Why the fuck saudi arabia cant wear them,they are not responsable for things that happend.
```
Because Musilms = Terrorists
it's like a math equation now
=
hewillnotdevideus [2]
^aka Shia's Autistic orcheasta
Saudis fund Isis duds
fuck
wrong person
Wrooooooooong
for Discord Desktop version
bruh
im so sorry
wait
the browser version?
nvm
kek
whats it called
BetterDiscord
oh
that shit
implying the human races were ever united
what plugin was it
for the quote
"man this sure is distressing, better keep walking"
also I find it disappointingly funny that that was the only thing you had to post regarding that incident
*@Snake - Yesterday at 9:13 PM from <#274375742433787904>*
```@Nazi-San
what plugin was it
for the quote
```
ye
ye?
which one is it
give me a link or somethin
wy
just go to BD server lmfao
this man did the same thing
shame no one cares he does it
just fkin give it to me
STOP BEING SO DIFFICULT
i cant
wait i'll upod it
^there
so its called replayer
repleyer*
and how do i get a tokenm
idk
Difference being you can clearly see medics are already at the scene in the top photo, where they are not in the second. If medic has already arrived, you only intervene to help in drastic, gigantic, armageddon level circumstances
What's the woman going to do when people are already attending
Stand there and look busy?
Stop and ask if you need help for starters
It looks like the big crowd in the top pic took notice
The bottom pic has someone (presumably) calling the emergency services, with a decent amount of people surrounding the injured person. The lady clearly didn't have any expertise with first aid otherwise she would have helped
In this instance why is it wrong to carry on walking when there are other people clearly doing a job that you either can't do or would be doing the same?
Because it's simply common sense and common courtesy to stop and ask if any extra help is needed in these circumstances, you don't simply walk past as if they're invisible. What if you needed materials from the store immediately and ambulances were still too far away? What if they needed other people to hold someone down either to keep them down or keep them *intact?* they're extreme and rare examples in which didn't occur here presumably, but it goes without saying that the point still stands.
In that case, why did the man not stop out of common courtesy?
There's nothing stopping a person from asking paramedics if they need assistance
What the hell is the guy in the bottom picture next to the lady sneezing doing? Apart from looking down helplessly.
Because medics are already there. I just said that when they've arrived, then you would only need to stop and see if more help is needed in the case it's basically armageddon
There's not really a point in criticsing someone in a panicked state
Everyone reacts differently
>this ones better :^)
>crops almost every important piece out
Yeah, that sure is better
Yeah considering you already know the context
It is better
But it really isnt at all
This one shows her as visibly distraught, not just a person with a blank face walking by
Everyone reacts differently [2]
Sociology taught me this
This one also cuts out the victim lying on the ground and the many civillians (see: not medics) helping the man
You seem to have missed where I said you already know the context
There's "reacting differently" and then there's just being a yseless bystander when there's someone bleeding out on the sidewalk without professional help
The people near the victim are also being useless bystanders
There's a man just looking down next to the lady sneezing
I'm sure if they needed civilian help, the lady attending the man would've called out for it
It's wrong to single her out when there are others doing the same
Others are doing the same
You're correct, they are just standing there-- right after having asked if any help was needed and standing by just in case.
That is the difference here
You don't know that
Sure, they could just be standing around because the victim owes them a couple dollars
"Now, however, the photographer who took the picture, Jamie Lorriman, has explained the real context of the snap.
"The people who took on that picture are being rather selective," Lorriman toldย ABC. "In the other picture in the sequence she looks truly distraught. Personally, I think she looks distressed in both pictures.
"It's wrong it's been misappropriated in that way."
They could have been present near the attack and avoided injury but are too shocked to move or act
It's funny how it's "hurr you dont know that you dont know the full story!!" only when it's convenient
Dude
No its true, none of us know the true story so why pass comment
Reread what you just said
Please
Sure they're not walking past but they also didn't help
If you have any sense in your head, in your brain, you will realize just how fucking stupid that is
*there's a fucking blanket on the guy*
Homu, if you have any sense in your head, in your brain, you will realise just how stupid it is to judge someone on a single action that is not unique to them
How the fuck can you look at that and say "oh theyre not helping theyre just frozen in fear!"
You do realise you're assuming things right
Because in that photo only one person is being shown to help
Others are standing there looking down
Yes, they are standing by and watching him in case help is needed until medics arrive
Theyre not fucking frozen in fear or some dumb shit you're trying to suggest
Then why do they need additional help?
That's not what I'm saying, I'm providing possible options for why people may not react
Ah but yes, here comes your different scenarios again
You're making excuses that are unreasonable and outside of reality
Since when was shock not a factor in people's reactions?
I honestly don't see why we're not slating the photographer
@Snake because these people were either hit by a truck or slashed open with a knife. It's not as simple as call medics and throw on a blanky. If he starts bleeding out or other complications arrive, then the more people there to help the better
a truck? The guy was driving a Hyundai
It was a police officer who was stabbed
The more people to argue whether to do something which could be fatal? Some of these bystanders have no medical experience (it's a goood chance)
The photographer didn't make the assumption it was the people who viewed it
Why is the photographer not helping instead of taking pictures
It's their job to record a snapshot of this stuff
They may well help after
Yes, a "truck" was poor wording since that can imply giant trucker type trucks. I was not implying that here.
No no I understand
So
You understood
But still decided to be an ass about it
Others reading this may not
That's why I corrected
You seem a bit too focused on just us 3 here, other people may read this without commenting
It's important they don't get the wrong information
The lady didn't do anything wrong here, she really didn't.
Except completely ignore the situation as medics still hadn't arrived
So if everyone walking past had to join in before medics arrive, you'd end up with too many people to viably help
"Too many cooks spoil the broth" and all that
2,140 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/9
| Next