ah

She retweeted something from It’s Going Down so I guess I’m not surprised if that’s true.

can you define domestic terrorist? http://www.berkeleyside.com/2017/09/24/chelsea-manning-addresses-crowd-anti-fascist-anti-milo-marchers/

Yeah she’s crazy https://twitter.com/xychelsea/status/955843121274851328

https://twitter.com/xychelsea/status/955535851743715328

i cant take a tweet with that number of emojis seriously

if you put lipstick on a terrorist does it make them a hero?

Apparently it makes them run for senate. Who knew?

can fellons run for senate?

can honest people would be a better question

Hillary was able to run for president so I guess yes but only if you’re a democrat.

also, why is it that every modern democrat woman looks like a man?

She’s trans.

lets just say looking at them all, i wouldn't have guessed 🤔

It’s a weird leftist thing to intentionally make yourself look terrible. Never understood why they do it.

i always attributed it to that tale from that childrens book writer

that a person with ugly thoughts, every minute of every day, they slowly become ugly

Look at this https://theblacksphere.net/2017/02/leftist-transformations-gone-bad/

Yeah that makes sense.

🤔 that's a shit article tbh

It is but it’s the first I found in search.

if you want to look at ugly people http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/ is the way to go

tbh, those people have no structure and control over life, have no meaning to their existance, and have no personality, so they define themselves by some pre-writen identity

what

no those walmart people are just nutters

i refered to that article from CreativeRealms, on those people who turned emo

I’d say it’s worse than emo.

yeah but

so are the people in that article lmfao

nah its just attention seeking, these are people who hate themselves for not being unique enough, so they just go with whats considered awful and rebelious

it only becomes insanity if you keep it up after age 25

you should get a full time job as a strawman factory

why?

blanket assumptions about the motivation of an entire class of people

what class am i defining them by?

"those people have no structure and control over life, have no meaning to their existance, and have no personality, so they define themselves by some pre-writen identity"
i assume you were talking about the leftist trans people referred to in the article

no im refering to anyone that goes from a normal average person with no apparent issues into a mental case before they're 25

who cares about trans people, 99% of those leftist people aren't even trans

wut

this is exceedingly subjective at this point

how so?

"mental case"

The people in the thing I posted not all are trans.

i'm aware

sorry if i consider people who think that the length of their hair and shoving an interesting amount of metal into their facial region defines their status of how they self identify a fictional status outside the realm of mentally sound individuals

🤔 again more subjective garbage

so?

children do weird shit all the time for attention, why is this suddenly different?

constructive arguments and breaking down issues is better than name calling

yes, and i'll be sure to use arguments and breaking down issues when i talk to a fairy person directly

i dont see why not

god forbid they learn how to reason and question themselves

if they learn that, they'll stop such weird behaviour automatically, until that, nothing i say will change them, so i might aswell say it for what it is

if i call a rational person who's doing weird a weirdo, they'll just agree

so why do you take issue with that i said?

i never called them names either

not everyone you think is crazy is without reason

i never implied that, i said they have a very good reason, which is a lack of stability in their life for <reason>

"until that, nothing i say will change them"

yes, you ever tried talking to one of those rabid leftists?

reason won't exactly make them go "hmm good point, i'll stop being mad now"

does that not say they are without reason?

i said that about you suggesting i argue with them instead of calling them names

don't twist my responses now

thats not fair

Their feelings are the defining factor of their reasoning. Not facts.

again

**who?**

the people you claim i'm insulting instead of arguing with

look man, you raised objection with me saying those children who went emo have lost stability in their life and thats why they're acting like that, they'll either fix it by age 25 or have some mental issues

and now you're just confusing yourself because of my responses to your objections

that group isn't even well defined since you have been wording everything like a strawman instead of a classification

ah the ol' strawman strawman

so me refering to "everyone that spontaneously changes like that during adolescent years" is a strawman is it?

got it

"like that"

again

subjective

that's not a proper classification

I’m not sure it’s possible to classify those people.

exactly

subjective? we're talking about seeminly well adjusted people that suddenly turned into near-skinheads, with metal shoved through every orifice and claim they're a Quad-gendered octopus

are we digging into lives the people of the article specifically or people you would subjectively put into the same boat of crazies

in which case

elaborate it

you know, the new "right wing boogeyman"

or else your opinions (on that group) are useless

@ping your arbitrary "comment guidelines" are useless

so the point of this is that you're confused because i made a statement about a clearly depicted group of people, mentioned them and explained how they are generaly resembled

and you find that too broad, and therefore its a strawman

no, the "those people have no structure and control over life, have no meaning to their existance, and have no personality, so they define themselves by some pre-writen identity"
and "nah its just attention seeking, these are people who hate themselves for not being unique enough, so they just go with whats considered awful and rebelious"
is the strawman

they are 😮

having your opinion on a group is fine

but it doesn't make any sense if the group is loosely defined

so you're saying that "rebelious youth" are not defined just that way?

there i branded it for you

Rebelious Youth
Sponteneous Young Freaks
Attention Seekers
Misguided Children

lul you just pulled a cathy newman

lmao, he did not

you said the group i defined, was loosely defined

I wish gifs were postable in this one, popcorn.gif

so, rebelious youth

They are trying to be unique by acting the way they do so expecting us to define them as something specific is near impossible. Most we can do is group them by the tendencies most of them have.

Younglings that act like stereotypes