general
Discord ID: 463054787336732683
845,392 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 645/8454
| Next
But I also don't care
They aren't actively preventing people from getting married
They backed away (along with just about everyone else) after the Sumpreme Court decision
And the groups they were actually funding did more than petition against gay marriage. They did charity work too.
But they backed away from that too under pressure.
"It accommodates 141 students including a section of our All Gender Student Housing Community." So one of the dorms at my college has gender neutral living. https://www.wooster.edu/students/reslife/halls/kenarden/ fucking lunatics
Have you gotten one of the surveys where it's a full page to identify your gender yet?
I still remember the first time I saw one of those.
Yes, Otherkin was an option.
I took a bullshit diversity survey at work. I labelled myself Polygender
@Dan V tbh i think these corporations need to step the fuck away from politics
Why has "other" become awful?
And choosing sides
@Rabbi Shekels agreed. It's not good business. It's only a liability
I chose bisexual but said I don't identify with LGBTQ...
Which is the truth
@Rabbi Shekels FWIW, In Chic-Fil-a's case it wasn't even the company. It was just the CEO.
Im not anti gay or anything but a business taking a stance on something can only hurt business
Unlike Burger King recently.
Disproportionate power.
@pratel yes i do memba it being the ceo and not the company
But still even the ceo should stfu
Here's the thing. Burger King is getting good press.
Burger King...maybe you should focus on product quality instead of pushing myths
Hes there to make profits not hurt profits even though profits need to be abolished like cortez sed lel
There's only more reason for Burger King to continue.
And they will.
Apple made a trillion bucks btw
This isn't the first time they've played politics. They entered the homosexual debate in 2014 on the other side.
#abolishprofits
The corporations will continue to play politics as long as they get away with it.
Chic Fil A backed down because the left is relentless and doesn't forget.
But not even backing down is enough.
As I understand, when the news broke of the CEO's donations, Chic Fil A actually saw a sales surge.
And profits went up.
Playing politics can be beneficial.
But pressure can force the truce.
It's a high risk/high reward scenario
Which is a statement that contradicts my earlier statement lmao
well, it's correct.
And unless the risk is great enough, the corporations will continue to run unabated.
And the press is providing cover.
make everything political and then nothing will be
indeed. Which is a strategy the left has been pursuing for some time.
It also highlights a risk of fighting back.
if its the ceo
then im not sure it should matter as much
if its an actual corporate donation then it definetly should matter
That's not how the game is played though.
Attack, attack, attack is the idea.
Regarding Tim's tweet
is it media
or is it propaganda
Jack dorsey went off thebreservation but they forgave him
shit
Dude lol
who' sarah jeong?
first I've hear dof her today
She a racist asian tht the nytimes hired
short answer: a racist hired by the nyt
ahh
and they're still ok with it
because hoenstly
I really do think many of the left is closet racist
Yeah racism is ok with the nytimes just not against black people ok ๐
they adressed it while announcing the hire
apple hit $1 Trillion today
in what? fantasy stock money? or actual in the bank money?
in valuation
so fantasy stock money it is
how much stock is available times value
call it fake if you want, but that's what it is lol
then how much stock company owns times value
not fake. fantasy.
Pretend money is good money
fake would include all money ๐
technically everything is fantasy
matter of perspective
your perspective is fantasy ๐
ya
but more serious: the concept of stock markets is stupid. just be honest and bet on horses.
its better than the alternative
The judge in the manafort case is shitting all over mueller
you mean companies being owned by the person that founded them?
Conspiracy lovers are going to love this judgment: " But Joel and Mary Rich were not defamed in the article, and in order to prove infliction of emotional distress, they had to meet a higher burden, namely that the networkโs conduct was โextreme and outrageous.โ Daniels ruled that the networkโs behavior did not rise to that level."
Seth richard was assasinated by hilldogโs assasin
Fucking jim acosta again this mother fucker
Sanderโs threw some shade at him today
She ripped him apart
yeup
posted that earlier
@LotheronPrime im watching it now
Shes got some balls on her im telling you all the shit she gets
which is exactly her point
she doens't whime or bitch and he does
Im not a fan of sarah sanders but man all the shit she has to deal with she handles herself well
845,392 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 645/8454
| Next