It's a high risk/high reward scenario

Which is a statement that contradicts my earlier statement lmao

well, it's correct.

And unless the risk is great enough, the corporations will continue to run unabated.

And the press is providing cover.

make everything political and then nothing will be

indeed. Which is a strategy the left has been pursuing for some time.

It also highlights a risk of fighting back.

if its the ceo

then im not sure it should matter as much

if its an actual corporate donation then it definetly should matter

That's not how the game is played though.

Attack, attack, attack is the idea.

Regarding Tim's tweet

is it media

or is it propaganda

Jack dorsey went off thebreservation but they forgave him

shit

http://www.wkyt.com/content/news/Active-shooter-reported-at-Wright-Patterson-Air-Force-Base-in-Dayton-489898461.html

Dude lol

who' sarah jeong?

first I've hear dof her today

She a racist asian tht the nytimes hired

short answer: a racist hired by the nyt

ahh

and they're still ok with it

because hoenstly

I really do think many of the left is closet racist

Yeah racism is ok with the nytimes just not against black people ok 👌

they adressed it while announcing the hire

apple hit $1 Trillion today

in what? fantasy stock money? or actual in the bank money?

in valuation

so fantasy stock money it is

how much stock is available times value

call it fake if you want, but that's what it is lol

then how much stock company owns times value

not fake. fantasy.

Pretend money is good money