What the heck is a Milf Reject?

Uh be careful typing in “lisa page nudes” on google image search bois

someone who was not a milf but was still an obaba

Wtf is a obaba ?

This is when she left FBI.

XD

She luk uggo there but other pics she luk gud

She got a purty mouf

Months after leaving FBI.

What a mature professional milf ^

Apparently her leaving FBI has done worders for her stress.

Lmao

W/e though she really fucked the guys she fucked ....over though

Look at that smile 😊

Well she isn't going to be in much trouble since she is confessing to investigators.

Not a flattering pic ^

Shes squealing

Yupe.

She done Peter to the curb, he bounced off and landed under the bus.

>.>

Might need to give her the white glove service

I don't blame her... look out smug he is.

He thinks he is the god damn king of the world.

Idk man picturing her banging strzok makes me not find her as hot ....dammit mark

Lmao

He looks like a fucking devil in this picture.

Ewww wtf bro ma dik is turtling

Theres gotta be a sex tape of page and strzok

There’s txts

There has to be nudes and vids

Why are you so set on finding nudes of her/

Dear god

Im not im just saying theres got to be nudes

Its too similar

XD

Im glad he got fired

Hannibal is more based tbh.

Eww das scary

You guys ever notice that most of the terrorist attack happen in full libretard cities ?

Cali , nyc, canada

France , UK

I wonder if Democrats will jump on this Onion piece... believing it to be true.

https://politics.theonion.com/senate-republicans-seek-to-delay-kavanaugh-vote-until-a-1829114212

That rep from alaska said she might want to wait

The usual group of NeverTrumpers in the Senate are acting fidgety.

This ^

https://politics.theonion.com/trump-locked-out-of-white-house-after-accidentally-revo-1828394207

Thats gotta be a onion article ^

Lmao

It is.

I know

I honestly though that was real for a second

https://politics.theonion.com/trump-unfairly-claims-credit-for-rise-in-economic-inequ-1828972539

https://politics.theonion.com/cory-booker-expelled-from-senate-stripped-naked-force-1828894142

https://politics.theonion.com/trump-teeters-on-white-house-ledge-weighing-pros-and-co-1828751264

Lmao... got to love the onion.

They are pretty good at photoshopping pictures.

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/98261/jacob-rees-mogg-savages-wailing-banshee-mark

@TylerC He actually did nominate a democrat for a federal circuit. It got completely ignored. The Dems said "we actually like this pick" and the Reps outside a couple *very* plugged in elements just let it pass. No one noticed because there wasn't a fight. No one went "Oh, Trumps is actually a kind of reasonable guy." No "normies" woke up. It just passed a democrat judge into Hawaii and no one paid any mind.

Nominating a Dem to the supreme court is long-term suicide. Forget the election, you can just start chipping away at stuff like 1st or 2nd amendment for the life of the judge. No one amends the constitution anymore--they just nominate judges to "reinterpret" it.

There's also no way for Republicans to deny a Trump nominee without there being a fight and a split that destroys the party.

Surrendering to noise and yielding ground is dumb strategy. Simple capitulation when you hold the high ground defeats the whole purpose of fighting in the first place. "compromise" requires gaining something in return. Not a vague promise. Not a "it reduces the heat a bit." Not a "we'll be nicer down the line"

Realistically, it doesn't matter who Trump nominates, unless it's complete capitulation, the Dems will pull out all stops to fight.

See: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/11/democrats-praise-trumps-judicial-nominee-9th-circu/

Your entire argument with Atkins was completely misinformed.

Atkins is being a little too all-in. But the core idea of withdrawing the nominee and replacing him with someone "more palatable" is just beyond foolish.

@pratel fair enough, if its been tried then i withdraw the thought, it felt like a good idea at the time.

its not beyond foolish, but if it as done and didnt work, no problem. tried and tested

i can accept that

For a lot of us who have followed politics for awhile, it's been so tried and tested as to be beyond really thinking about.

Also, there are battles you pick and battles you fight.

The Supreme court is far too powerful and so it is always worth fighting over. This is why the Democrats are being so loud about it all. They want to make enough noise *somehow* to delay until they can put the Senate in play and then delay until they replace Trump.

ya i get the arguements you all are making.

really dont need the lecture to see your side of it. the facts about it having been tried are enough

Ok.

i get where you all are comming from

you dont want to believe i do

but i do

Nah, I get you.

I tend to focus on strategy.

Atkins was being just "no compromises"

thats what i was doing

I wanted to point out the fact that it'd been tried and what the strategy was.

tying to think of something to do that hasnt been done to get us past all this

But if you got it, I'll let it go.

if its been done, np'

If Feinstein won't even allow this Dem operative accuser to testify to the Senate Judiciary Committee then this latest dustup won't even amount to a delay.

agreed