Does anyone here actually know how to cite research

Just asking

Arent reform and revolution two sides of the same coin?

No

Revolution tends to be violent

One is peaceful, one is not.

like i mentioned before the "culture war" has devolved into activist culture and hasnt actually made significant policy changes regardless of which "side" your on

I think it did

@R9b1t Which citation method?

theres a bunch

Nothing good though

NYC is recognizing non-binary now

Three metoo movement is making companies to have strict sexual harrasment laws

I know the numbered ones, which I’m tempted to use for things like statements. I’m not sure how to cite a website, but I should just ask my English teacher, and I know the standard book method

Heck there are diversity officers

sure but are they protecting them under equal opportunity of employment?

I don't know about that

It's only a matter of time

thats what really matters

Like billc-16

I know that if I were asked to do a research paper next year in college, I could do it

What about affirmative action?

I think LGBT people should be protected under the same laws as everyone else

True

im anti-affirmative action

cause its racist

I like equal protection, not special rights

I understand why it is implemented but I think we should scrap it now

@R9b1t Look into MLA Format, Chicago Stlye, and APL (i think) Style

I used Chicago

```I think LGBT people should be protected under the same laws as everyone else```
I don't think so. Because there might be reasons you want to discriminate against those.

If you don't give equal opportunity to an oppressed group for decades they don't have a level playing field

In the current system

I think Milo is a good example of those reasons...

yes, lets discriminate against Bi-sexual gays!

Affirmative action helps them to compete in level playing field

But it should a have a time limit

"I like equal protection, not special rights" i agree with @Khanclansith

And there are some homophobic memes floating around in the Internets. The ones with gayness and pedophilia....

And based on income not on color

I only have ever used MLA, but I don’t think a lot of my schools will be like: “huh? NO! F!”

But I know how to cite MLA and write in MLA

Never used Chicago?

Never even seen it

Affirmative Action should be limited to Class and even then not shut people out entirely

even then its wrong'

Yeah your right it should be based on class

"Oh you're smart and rich, well though cuz this poor guy who has less grades gets your spot

Chicago is the footnote/endnotes style

But it should limit to only till college admissions not on jobs

“Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments: which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the Lord.”
‭‭Leviticus‬ ‭18:5‬ ‭KJV‬‬http://bible.com/1/lev.18.5.kjv

Class and Merit

I kind of like it

Maybe it’s just something different

if the poor guy is objectively better he gets in

```Affirmative Action should be limited to Class and even then not shut people out entirely```
Yeah, kinda...
Especially if there is a rich one with lower scores that might get in but the poor fuck with an awesome score might not.

So footnotes are cites for a page?

or at least he is prioritized

The moment Affirmative Action became about quotas it betrayed what the laws were writen to achieve!

You can't expect poor people to have the same resources as rich people

Also, random note on Timvid: What are the ecosystem impacts of a fence vs wall?

So I think merit will not help

pure merit, best person should get the spot, his wealth should have no status on it

idk it doesnt cost anything to apply for college

Merit will work when all groups have equal resources

I kind of feel like Chicago would bounce around making space for citations and typing

To study college

what if you have the son of a rich person, but daddy doesn't provide him with anything but the bare minimum?

And to get seats in ivy leagues

@Dr.Wol An egalitarian society wont be achieved that way alone

then you get held back cuz of your class

so if someone poor performs better in the application or the prior SATS/ACTs then they have merit

even if you're actually the same status

You have a shit dad

Performance

ultimately it would come down to performance

Yeah

“Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.”
‭‭Leviticus‬ ‭18:22‬ ‭KJV‬‬http://bible.com/1/lev.18.22.kjv

and if someone is poor then they have access to more aid

Affirmative action based on class not on color is good

if its done on class it has to be done with merit in mind

Depends are you saying everyone should score the same?

whay you put @Lagomaster24 what about “here” so people cant ping here people dont do that

ultimately the idea is to make Affirmative Action go away entirely

Regardless of class

“Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

(For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled;)”
‭‭Leviticus‬ ‭18:22, 27‬ ‭KJV‬‬http://bible.com/1/lev.18.22,27.kjv

We cant use @ everyone here but can @ here iirc

Matthew 7:1-3 King James Version (KJV)
Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

sudden bible quotes

random

yep

Jesus 420:69 “I don’t drink water because fish touched water with their dicks and that’s gay.”

lmao

Dr.Wol 1:1 "Cactuses and genitals don't mix"

"If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
- ‭‭1 John‬ ‭1:9‬ ‭KJV‬‬
http://bible.com/1/1jn.1.9.kjv

ro 1:1 “it’s ‘cacti’ retard”

Ok, I was simply trying to get across that quoting the Bible outside of what is being talked about is just annoying

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

jokeing

😆