or does my child suddenly no longer count as my child once they get past a certain age?

communism has lead to some extremely bad things in history, its an extreme, an opposite extreme to a far more common extreme in which it was conseived to fight against, the extreme of capitalism in which most of us live under. the extreme of capitalism is less harmful to us directly because it is not a system that immediately fights against the fundomental structure of economy, but it does slowly, without any regulation, put people in the positions of success spirals on the backs of people who's lively hood depend on those people being fair to them dispite the extreme difference in personal power between them.

my house my rules is a form of government. very small, very very local, but government none-the-less.

actually communism was a response against Aristocracy,

Starving poor plebs, and super-rich aristocrats

Are you being intentionally obtuse? A child, not your offspring

As in the developmental stage

Communism always ends when you eat all the rich

then you eat each other

If your kid hits age of majority they're only following your rules voluntarily, by virtue of living on your property or property you pay for

where did i say it was the developmental stage and not the colloquial term for offspring?

Were you not referring to my initial use of the term? You posed it as a question

not that it ultimately matters, the philosophy of my house, my rules, is still a form of government.

It's a form of exerting ownership

Which, if you're arguing with an ancap, they're on board with

In communism there's no ownership

they are. too bad they cannot figure out how to enforce private property to own without risking making a case for government

That's the initial argument they make though, which is that they can through private means

Like you can argue that's a shit solution, but saying they have no solution is dishonest

at which point, they are basically only one stepped removed from communism. because private property, outside that which you physically control, is what those around you agree is your property.

What?

The whole point is that you have to come to a social agreement about property either way, and have some form of consensus as to how to deal with violation of private property. This occurs even *with* a government

this occurs all the time because that is society, period, since humans starting making groups of other humans, yes.

Yes, and humans aren't always one step removed from communism

communism isint a very human ideology

that sounds like something a person who's one step removed from communism would say!

You got me [Patriotic Soviet Music Intensifies]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1016719866424946690

why not? communism, or more accurately probably called Marxism now? whatever you want to call the ultimate philosophy of no country, no property, anarchy with utopian levels of non-violence and cooperation, is basically just distributing resources among all society according to needs. This is done through a social agreement, because that is what we call cooperating with other humans. Replace needs with ability to get, and that's private property.

the difference between ancap and an ancom is who is getting the most resources.

That's a gross oversimplification

nah 😉 cuz the one getting most is the centrist warlord that gets a smart enough big clan to crush either

To the point where basically any system is "almost communism"

@Dr.Wol convert to Anarcho-Monarchism today

thats not anarcho-monarchism

thats imperialism

get a big tribe, crush all others and subjegate them all

and maintain order cuz you're the only one with the power of force

and just like that, government is back 😄

I meant moreso the idea of a central force that will crush other attempted governing bodies basically. Just the crushing, minus the subjugating :^)

thats genocide

No, genocide would be when you attack a whole ethnic group, not an attempted governing body

a gross oversimplification?

property is not something that exists. its made up. by humans. Resources exist, and we consume them. Anarchy removes all the bullshit that complicates things and brings it all back to the beginning: individuals cooperating with individuals. That's the start of all human civilization and things build from there. Property is just allocated resources. Capitalism is based off ability, Communism is based off need.

Genocide is intentional action to destroy a people (usually defined as an ethnic, national, racial, or religious group) in whole or in part.

Its not confined to just ethnic cleansing

That doesn't seem like it has much utility. Like by that logic all failed revolutions/coups/etc are examples of genocide

people usually implies the humans themselves, not their structures

you can destroy a governing body without killing the people

I specified other governing bodies, and the term genocide was still used

at least, not most of them

Or attempted governing bodies, rather

As for the property aspect, property is simply whatever resources you can control

Other governing bodies are another nation (national group)

Attempted governing bodies are not yet nations

i was not aware my town was a nation

it is certainly a different governing body

as is a state

That too

they're a sub-governing body of the full nation,

In ancap/ancom world there are no full blown nations,
So every "nation" is just the small group that decided to group together

your child governs his own life in the household, but still abides by your overarching governing as parent

and owner of the household

Right but my understanding of Anarcho-Monarchist theory is that you basically have one central force that exists to make sure that anyone who tries to expand beyond that point gets slapped down

so a state police to maintain order

Sort of like how Anarcho Primitivism works, but with accumulation of power rather than technology, and with a "big stick" central power instead of you just probably being stoned to death

or world police

Not quite

It would be regional for starters, and the idea would be to beat down warlords and the like

An anti imperialist emergency fund

Mind you, the obvious problems are the same as the nightwatchman state, but with more accumulated power. I'm not sure how they square that

I am a nobody

My only title is pleb

I feel very marginalized

Get marginalized bitch

@Chlodovech If you're a gamer, there's an easy fix.

https://gizmodo.com/is-elon-musk-serious-1827456578

Gamers are forced to wear a badge. This is basically Nazi Germany.

"whose minions" jesus christ they're still really mad at him for criticizing the media

Hahhahaha

Not even gonna click it

Being a victim gives you a lot of perks and boons

so maybe I should want to be a marginalized pleb willingly

lol at the comments

Are you white, straight, male, able bodied or cis?

the best bodied

Cuz then you're not allowed to be marginalized

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1016684366083190785

that's better

also lol

Bill in Congress to unmask Antifa like they did to the kkk https://twitter.com/jacksmithiv/status/1016721912276373504?s=21

It's so blatant that the Musk narrative swapped overnight. He was making amazing progress for the world, but then he criticized shit journalism and now he's just a rich white man wasting resources on frivolous shit while being a self important egoist

yup

lol

musket is the greatest over

stopmusk.com

hahaha

id get behind that bill

if you are going to protest, you shouldnt hide your indenty

meh I dunno

I think you absolutely should be able to protest anonymously

the right to be anonymous

should be allowed

thats kind of an authoritarian move/bill

There are numerous reasons for that. *But* anonymous property damage is garbage