๐๏ฝhistory
Discord ID: 801170151193575475
2,300 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/23
| Next
Question...has Biden made that special tax for those making over $400,000 a year yet?
id say there is 3
populist left
populist right
and establishment
you can say people want to be left alone but that isnt a real group they can hold these views and keep quiet.
its in history too ww2 and modern civil wars comes to mind
I think he did that at the same time he removed the Trump tax cuts
Those who wish to be left alone are their own faction. They have guns too, but they're not aligned with us. Narcos, Ancaps, that kind of thing? They don't believe in national pride. They think the whole idea of Nationalism and having a cultural identity as some sort of stupid joke.
If all of us got wiped out, I don't think they'd be sad.
Theyโre more like the drug addicted raiders from fallout
I was an Ancap for a long time. They're all about non-aggression. So they aint going to come hunting for you or your stuff. But they also don't believe in the idea of "Being an American."
It's either you believe in free trade and non-aggression, or you do not. There is no in-between.
establishment will concede to whatever is popular and within their interests.
populist left wants more for the people to sacrifice the state and in turn themselves by failing the rest
populist right wants to self govern and do whats right for them.
in my opinion the right has it more on spot with separate rules for different areas, but they want control like any other and will inact rules all the same that hurts different livelyhoods. there is no real one policy just self governance for each area for their needs. and if it fails people leave and it collapses. to be born again with a new idea. non-urban areas has it easier cus less restriction works.
Iโm gonna go out on a limb and say theyโre anti capitalists?
Who?
Ancaps
No, Ancap stands for "Anarcho-capitalist."
^
Ah I see
Doesnโt the anarcho part seem a little contradictory to the whole nonaggression thing?
So as long as you're not trading in people *anything* is on the table for sale. Sex, drugs whatever.
not all anarchists are non-agressive
but most who want a civilized society do
^
Anarchist simply means "Without Authority."
Broken down to its constitute latin.
yep, some can take that as no rules mad max it, and some say smoke weed and grow our own food
They seem like fun people to trade with
ever been to the almish?
You mean the Amish?
they are almost a anarchy. their own rules, their own ways of doing things, they still trade like any other
sorry if fast typing i learned a few days ago if you dont type fast you get beaten XD
It's an extreme sport, it is ๐
yep lol
Fun fact: All amish have modern rifles.
#not all
Really? I know the ones here do.
i know i group i buy lumber from who make their own muskets XD
In which general area is โhereโ
Minnesota
Isnโt that where Tyler Zed is?
east kentucky i can drop a pin but i dont know off hand cus i rarely go there
Yeah, he actually posted some videos of an area I grew up near. Won't say where.
but ill say best lumber around worth the drive
Well, I won't say the video. I grew up in Stillwater.
Being in Cali, itโs kind of hard to prepare for a shit hit the fan scenario, because we donโt have basements, guns and ammunition are more scarce then the other states, especially now, and there are lots of idiots here
im sorry man
Leave. Come to the land of Ice and Snow.
im looking for primers, other then that the tennessee is pretty good!
Iโm have like $80 rn
Enough for a bus ticket.
And we have welfare programs up the wazoo. You'll be back on your feet in no time.
and dont think i know land of ice and snow, i was born and raised wisconsonite we know cheese beer and guns, but tennessee tax and housing is so much cheeper!
I don't doubt it, Serenity.
Iโll probably save up, and gather important stuff for a bug out bag and shit like that in case CA decides to become Fallout without the nukes and fun shit
We should probably stop clogging the chat with things that have nothing to do with History.
Probably yeah
all the advice i can give is from a bus ticket you can make the world. my sister did it, i did it, we chose different paths she went to chicago i went to tennesee, she bacame a liberal and still rents to this day i worked in a factory and bought a house
You guys have mics?
yep
Join me in general 1.
Not at the moment no, Iโm out of the house looking for something
In case anyone saw that cringy video where Arnold Schwarzenegger compared the capitol incident to the "night of broken glass" and didn't know what he was talking about...
**THIS** is what he was comparing it to:
https://www.history.com/topics/holocaust/kristallnacht
That is not what id compare the capitol incident to
the last 8 months? definitely
Thatโs what I thought when I read above. The BLM riots was way closer.
Thank you, at least someone actually said it. Also itโs like everyone saying to me โTrumpโs worse than Hitlerโ Hitler killed 6 million of my people so no despite any opinions on Trump, statistically Hitler is still pure evil who realistically shouldnโt be compared to
People like Stalin weren't better, despite what idiots on the left said, he also attacked poland from the other side out of a grudge over the russian defeat at least 20 years earlier
FINALLY...someone else knows that Hitler and Stalin tag-teamed Poland....
And thatโs a good point and Stalin is one of a few in history who you can compare to Hitler because both were evil cunts
My god..I have history professors trying to tell me differently and Iโm like..
โWhat....no!? Hitler and Salian had the Soviet-Nazi Non-aggression pact.โ
The Molotov-Ribintrov pact
Most likely spelt that wrong
But for real the ones comparing more regular and level headed people and politicians to Hitler are those that didnโt do too well in history class
If Iโm correct itโs a type of way to win people on your side....itโs like, I donโt know how to phrase it precisely, a real thing where you brainwash people by mind tricking them by following some steps... I think 5-7, not for sure.
1) talk about the other person.
2) mention what they believe.
3) ask the audience, โring a bell?โ โWho else said thatโ etc.
4) point out Hitler/ Stalin
5) โcompareโ their beliefs
Iโm confused
How does anyone remotely versed in history *not* know that the USSR attacked Poland as well
The first stages of Barbarossa were in Poland iirc
History teachers/ professors are leaving it out. Like my cousin in high school (the same one I graduated from 3 years ago) is now having it to where any WW2 information is only about the USA joining the war till it ends...the โnight of knivesโ โbullbeer Marchโ and etc are being left out. Even the Nazi swastica is being dropped.
Also they tend not to focus on the Soviet Union. Especially on collage campusโ because itโs a hard task to pump communist ideologies into students but then properly condemn the USSR. Also as an aside because The Allied powers sided with The Commenturn (again poor spelling my apologies) not out of a love for the USSR but because Hitler broke the pact with Stalin and โthe enemy of my enemy is my friendโ so any enemy of Nazi Germany is The Allies Friend. However thanks to the Cold War the involvement of the USSR is often downplayed so rather than Germany and Russia invading Poland itโs simply phrased as โGermany invaded Polandโ at least thatโs how it was taught to me in Secondary school which is the British equivalent to high school
Technically it starts with Germany invading poland, just that Russia joined in a little after that
The British East India Company had control of India from 1757 to 1857, so could the East India Company be considered the first real example of Anarcho-Capitalism?
just an interesting thought that came to my mind
It's interesting how no one really talks about the Soviets invading Poland. If i recall correctly, it happened 16 days after Germany did, (i may be incorrect).
The first reports of Russians entering polish territory were documented to be roughly 2 weeks after the initial invasion by Germany
So by sheer nature the soviets are overshadowed by the Nazis because they was there first
who like roman empire
Donโt fool yourself. Calling Hitler Pure evil is absolutely wrong. Iโm not defending the man, but when you call a man a monster, you must keep in mind that he is in fact man. Know that saying ,โPerhaps the greatest trick the devil pulled was convincing everyone that he didnโt existโ? That principle applies here
People - human beings are capable of tremendous good and terrible evil.
I would also point who on first place allow him to take "power" in Germany
Weimar Republic
Yes it happen on 17/09/1939 My grandfather twas taken as a prisoner of war by soviets
i am sorry to hear that
he run away than German caught him and he spent 4 years in Dachau, but he survive
Fascism is the result after the inevitable faillure of Communism. See modern China for details.
Fascism is evil, and it's awful in virtually every way. But at least it's workable.
That's not a defense of Fascism, merely an indictment of Communism.
well, not necessarily. Hitler and Mussolini were Fascists and they were an authoritarian force to fight the authoritarian Communists
That's a non sequiter.
How does that mean that Fascism does not follow in the wake of Communism?
its more of the other way around
for example, Pol Pot's regime came after the Facsist Dictatorship of Prince Sianouk
I never said that Communism can't follow fascism.
I said that Fascism comes after communism.
You're putting words in my mouth.
2,300 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/23
| Next