Can do

Yay!

I hopped in general

G2G have fun✌

@Deleted User bye ☺️

I do not consider myself to be drunk on being right. I made my points and disagreed with yours. I then dropped the issue after seeing that, rather than continue to argue, as someone who continued to drink from the wine of drama. @bible whore 1

@MaxIgnoramus *"petulance?"* You're really reaching

Lol

Your points and proof actually smiled upon mine

Then disowned your own proof

The point I wanted to make from it was screenshotted and sourced. The rest of the suppositions on the article are simply sourced extrabiblically and I don't care about them.

It was stated in the way I wanted.

Talmud and Kabbalah are *not* Biblical.

@bible whore 1 Lol! U have short term memory. U claimed *Lilith* was an anthropomorphic character, & that she was *"Adam's 1st wife,"* AND that it's scriptural, & were owned per the Bible u tried to graft ur revisionist interpretationd upon. Then when that didn't work for u, u quoted a non biblical text & recycled ur chosen revision.

....kaba-blah...

👌

First off I ignored your message to end the fight

@Deleted User LULZ

Second off Isaiah is not extra

@bible whore 1 Like you're ignoring ur defeat? ✔

@bible whore 1 Not talking about Isaiah genius

👌

Isaiah is biblical

@Deleted User Isaiah speaks of Lilith

But okay

Also it’s not a defeat

You can’t debate

You literally can’t

@bible whore 1 Nope, we went over this and @Deleted User call u on this too; you asserted a revision based of a mischaracterization of the passages which etymologically debunked your dead argument. The end

Lol

U have nothing

U had nothing

The end

The etymology was on my side

Lilith = screech owl

Even his source said it

@bible whore 1 Not Isaiah....that is not even a legit ref. I was talking about this:

That is not from the bible

@Deleted User what did I say after that ss?

@bible whore 1 Lol! Screech owl is a metaphor, not an allusion to a person. You've hung yourself

HA YOU READ THE ARTICLE, now what did it say

@bible whore 1 Bible > Article. Bible = proof that your article is bullshit. Next?

I don't care about what the rest of the article said. The screenshot is my thoughts on the matter.

@bible whore 1 I thought they gave this guy his own channel. Still only one Post in it from 24 hours ago. Does this mean I'm free to post whatever I want in that channel?

The author said what I wanted to say.

In the screenshot.

@Deleted User She's clueless

@Deleted User
She doesn't understand the words

She's framing up her revision, which BTW falls apart when the etymological value of the words contrary to her muddle denies her revisionist assertion.

@Deleted User .... I can’t say yes, but honestly I won’t stop you

👍

I'll be respectful, even though he isn't.

I believe you are still a member in my server. If you ever get tired of the relentless, pointless arguing, stop in & see us.

Awe thanks

But we have found the solution to our problem, this channel will be friendly again soon ☺️

Really?!

Yup!

Impressive

What solution?

We are making rules to each channel

Lol, the final solution

Hmmm

Hmmm

No bad AZ

We back at fighting abouth Lilth thing again?

Oh rules. That's gonna be dope. You guys gonna make a debate and discussion channel tab?

I believe that solution is sound

Already there

It’s been there

Text? Not voice

I already made my points.

@MaskedHeathen. Have one, its never used

My bad

Im blind.

What is this? Text? 😱

@MaskedHeathen Hey man how goes?

Pretty good. At work currently.

Good rule good rule

@Deleted User do you know how bad I wanted to make rule two “eat my ass”

Something tells me these guys would eat it if it were presented & offered.

New Religion channel

@MaskedHeathen She already lost. She asserted Babylonian mythology & tried graphting לילית into the Biblical narrative contrary to the literal scripture which identifies an allusion to Babylonian legacies per Babylonian false idols; she claimed *"Lilith"* is Biblically identified as an anthropomorphic character, specifically *"Adam's 1st wife (which is untrue, & unbiblical)."* She got the etymology wrong, & ate her words. 1 day later, she's still stuck on her loss

The end

Lol

They wouldn’t get the chance

Truth

I said they where made around the same time

@bible whore 1 then why offer it?

Who said I was offering to you?

I actually tagged az

Not you

👀

There is a Shitposting channel also

@MaskedHeathen We're in VC bro 👌

You were gonna add that to the Rules. That's either telling I have to eat it.

Step into the Thunderdome

Lol

Actually it would have been directed at AZ

How old are these kids anyway?