The point I wanted to make from it was screenshotted and sourced. The rest of the suppositions on the article are simply sourced extrabiblically and I don't care about them.

It was stated in the way I wanted.

Talmud and Kabbalah are *not* Biblical.

@bible whore 1 Lol! U have short term memory. U claimed *Lilith* was an anthropomorphic character, & that she was *"Adam's 1st wife,"* AND that it's scriptural, & were owned per the Bible u tried to graft ur revisionist interpretationd upon. Then when that didn't work for u, u quoted a non biblical text & recycled ur chosen revision.

....kaba-blah...

👌

First off I ignored your message to end the fight

@Deleted User LULZ

Second off Isaiah is not extra

@bible whore 1 Like you're ignoring ur defeat? ✔

@bible whore 1 Not talking about Isaiah genius

👌

Isaiah is biblical

@Deleted User Isaiah speaks of Lilith

But okay

Also it’s not a defeat

You can’t debate

You literally can’t

@bible whore 1 Nope, we went over this and @Deleted User call u on this too; you asserted a revision based of a mischaracterization of the passages which etymologically debunked your dead argument. The end

Lol

U have nothing

U had nothing

The end

The etymology was on my side

Lilith = screech owl

Even his source said it

@bible whore 1 Not Isaiah....that is not even a legit ref. I was talking about this:

That is not from the bible

@Deleted User what did I say after that ss?

@bible whore 1 Lol! Screech owl is a metaphor, not an allusion to a person. You've hung yourself

HA YOU READ THE ARTICLE, now what did it say

@bible whore 1 Bible > Article. Bible = proof that your article is bullshit. Next?

I don't care about what the rest of the article said. The screenshot is my thoughts on the matter.

@bible whore 1 I thought they gave this guy his own channel. Still only one Post in it from 24 hours ago. Does this mean I'm free to post whatever I want in that channel?

The author said what I wanted to say.

In the screenshot.

@Deleted User She's clueless

@Deleted User
She doesn't understand the words

She's framing up her revision, which BTW falls apart when the etymological value of the words contrary to her muddle denies her revisionist assertion.

@Deleted User .... I can’t say yes, but honestly I won’t stop you

👍