Need we point to feminist academia for more evidence that just because it's published doesn't make it true. Or even sensical.

I never grammar policed

Feminist academics don't rely on empirical data and falsifiable claims

IQ science is absolutely hard science because it deals with very concrete data points.

Also, you originally stated that there should be tax incentives for high IQ people to marry and have kids. But this is about cognitive abilities, and this does not directly correlate to an IQ test.

WOW

WOWOW

IQ is the best way to measure general intelligence

No?

Okay, reading that abstract, it straight says there's no evidence of the genes causing heritable intelligence.

It's not perfect, but it is the absolute best way to right now.

Again, intelligence spans many spectrums

IQ accounts for that.

No

It doesn't

It measures general intelligence

No. That's been proven to be the opposite. It's no longer the standard.

Also a true IQ test isn't even what most people think it is.

There's other things it can measure as well.

A proper IQ test does actually break down different types of intelligence

I still stand firm that you took an IQ test and felt that now that you had a high IQ number that you could stand on that and judge life from that pedestal

@Deleted User Post the study then

What is the standard now?

Like you posted your bullshit? Sure.

Right. This has gotten tedious.

Like general IQ IIRC is basically just the mean score of all the different tests

No one has linked a single scientific paper disproving anything I've said.

Not sure even why I jumped back into this.

@RoflTank You are correct.

@Runes Me neither, because you are just wrong.

Sad days.

So, what's your IQ?

Not sure, I've never taken an IQ test.

Lies

Utter lies

I know mine when I was like, 5. I haven't done an adult test.

Best I can do is extrapolate from my GT score.

You put so much stake into this that I guarantee that you've taken at least two

The second when the first scored lower than you thought you should be

Me taking an IQ test or not has no bearing on IQ science.

sure is POLITICS in here

ScIeNcE iS PoLiTIcS

kike

IQ science has a lot of political implications.

science is facts not politics

empirical, observable, experimentally repeatable facts.

only science I need to know

is helicopters

gravity

and commies

https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(12)00584-3

Yeet a thousand commies out of a helo

Enjoy. A Canadian study on why IQ testing and IQ is flawed as a whole.

test gravity

What's the bias correction on a canuckistani anti-IQ paper?

Around the turn of the 2010s, IQ has been pushed by by academia and universities as flawed.

@Deleted User Alright, I'll give it a read.

The same academia and universities run almost universally by anti-science pro-feels commies.

Mensa are even shifting from it FYI

That's uncomfortably close to an argument from authority

There are about 5-10 studies on IQ this decade alone but, it's five am. I just rolled over and posted the first one I found

As I hate that "cite your sources shit," when the OG person asking never cited anything

@RoflTank

I distinctly remember in Uni IQ being pushed away.

Basically it is like measuring height in terms of basketball.

It's a good metric but, it doesn't mean just cause someone is short they aren't a good basketballer

Again, the standard IQ test measures different intelligences.

It's not the go to test anymore. They use a lot more tests including IQ to get intelligence.

Yes

What tests?

*generalized* IQ is no longer the bar

I know about scanning

I don't know of any other test.

Studying a child/person from childhood to adulthood. Standard IQ test. Scanning. Etc.

About three ways I know of.

It's like how big brain niggas can be so fucking dumb

^

Because they might be book smart but have no common sense

Booksmart you mean

Ah

Yep

Which is something a standard IQ test shows

Or how gang bangers got street smarts but they are retarded monkeys

Well, the proper battery of separate tests

Anyways the point isn't that IQ tests are wrong. I still feel they are useful regardless what feminist unis say

I just feel studying someone should take in more data and be more well rounded

I mean IQ works well in regards to African nations lmao

I think the point here is that we still need to do a LOT more research.

Also have you seen how big IQ test niggas can somehow (rarely) shit up the asvab or SATS

Or fail a logic test they have never encountered before

I dunno. Regardless of the study I posted my personal feelings are IQ still generally works for most purposes

But establishment atm is pushing IQ as wrong and racist

So what I've gathered from this data is that brain scanning is better for detecting intelligence and that intelligence is comprised of several components rather than being unitary. None of this really conflicts with IQ being one of the best ways to measure general intelligence and certainly does not undermine the idea of intelligence being mostly heritable.

http://www.emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Intelligence-and-socioeconomic-success-A-meta-analytic-review-of-longitudinal-research.pdf

It's a supplement

I think this is probably the most conclusive paper on the topic.

My argument isn't IQ is flawed like Uni's are pushing

My argument is it should be used with other methods

Which is that intelligence measured by IQ is a very good predictor of economic outcome.

Ie a battery of tests

IQ. Brain scanning. Practical tests etc.

I don't disagree, but I don't see how this conflicts with the idea of 'g' being mostly heritable.