Message from @RoflTank
Discord ID: 522993180686417940
empirical, observable, experimentally repeatable facts.
only science I need to know
is helicopters
gravity
and commies
Yeet a thousand commies out of a helo
Enjoy. A Canadian study on why IQ testing and IQ is flawed as a whole.
test gravity
What's the bias correction on a canuckistani anti-IQ paper?
Around the turn of the 2010s, IQ has been pushed by by academia and universities as flawed.
@Deleted User Alright, I'll give it a read.
The same academia and universities run almost universally by anti-science pro-feels commies.
Mensa are even shifting from it FYI
That's uncomfortably close to an argument from authority
There are about 5-10 studies on IQ this decade alone but, it's five am. I just rolled over and posted the first one I found
As I hate that "cite your sources shit," when the OG person asking never cited anything
I distinctly remember in Uni IQ being pushed away.
Basically it is like measuring height in terms of basketball.
It's a good metric but, it doesn't mean just cause someone is short they aren't a good basketballer
It's not the go to test anymore. They use a lot more tests including IQ to get intelligence.
Yes
What tests?
*generalized* IQ is no longer the bar
I know about scanning
I don't know of any other test.
Studying a child/person from childhood to adulthood. Standard IQ test. Scanning. Etc.
About three ways I know of.
It's like how big brain niggas can be so fucking dumb
^
Because they might be book smart but have no common sense
Booksmart you mean
Ah
Yep
Which is something a standard IQ test shows
Or how gang bangers got street smarts but they are retarded monkeys
Well, the proper battery of separate tests
Anyways the point isn't that IQ tests are wrong. I still feel they are useful regardless what feminist unis say
I just feel studying someone should take in more data and be more well rounded
I mean IQ works well in regards to African nations lmao