Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 522994796852150272


2018-12-14 04:28:34 UTC  

*generalized* IQ is no longer the bar

2018-12-14 04:28:35 UTC  

I know about scanning

2018-12-14 04:28:46 UTC  

I don't know of any other test.

2018-12-14 04:28:58 UTC  

Studying a child/person from childhood to adulthood. Standard IQ test. Scanning. Etc.

2018-12-14 04:29:09 UTC  

About three ways I know of.

2018-12-14 04:29:18 UTC  

It's like how big brain niggas can be so fucking dumb

2018-12-14 04:29:23 UTC  

^

2018-12-14 04:29:31 UTC  

Because they might be book smart but have no common sense

2018-12-14 04:29:34 UTC  

Booksmart you mean

2018-12-14 04:29:36 UTC  

Ah

2018-12-14 04:29:38 UTC  

Yep

2018-12-14 04:29:45 UTC  

Which is something a standard IQ test shows

2018-12-14 04:29:57 UTC  

Or how gang bangers got street smarts but they are retarded monkeys

2018-12-14 04:30:05 UTC  

Well, the proper battery of separate tests

2018-12-14 04:30:34 UTC  

Anyways the point isn't that IQ tests are wrong. I still feel they are useful regardless what feminist unis say

2018-12-14 04:30:55 UTC  

I just feel studying someone should take in more data and be more well rounded

2018-12-14 04:31:07 UTC  

I mean IQ works well in regards to African nations lmao

2018-12-14 04:31:13 UTC  

I think the point here is that we still need to do a LOT more research.

2018-12-14 04:31:46 UTC  

Also have you seen how big IQ test niggas can somehow (rarely) shit up the asvab or SATS

2018-12-14 04:31:58 UTC  

Or fail a logic test they have never encountered before

2018-12-14 04:34:36 UTC  

I dunno. Regardless of the study I posted my personal feelings are IQ still generally works for most purposes

2018-12-14 04:34:49 UTC  

But establishment atm is pushing IQ as wrong and racist

2018-12-14 04:35:04 UTC  

So what I've gathered from this data is that brain scanning is better for detecting intelligence and that intelligence is comprised of several components rather than being unitary. None of this really conflicts with IQ being one of the best ways to measure general intelligence and certainly does not undermine the idea of intelligence being mostly heritable.

2018-12-14 04:35:17 UTC  

It's a supplement

2018-12-14 04:35:24 UTC  

I think this is probably the most conclusive paper on the topic.

2018-12-14 04:35:36 UTC  

My argument isn't IQ is flawed like Uni's are pushing

2018-12-14 04:35:46 UTC  

My argument is it should be used with other methods

2018-12-14 04:35:46 UTC  

Which is that intelligence measured by IQ is a very good predictor of economic outcome.

2018-12-14 04:35:50 UTC  

Ie a battery of tests

2018-12-14 04:36:12 UTC  

IQ. Brain scanning. Practical tests etc.

2018-12-14 04:36:18 UTC  

I don't disagree, but I don't see how this conflicts with the idea of 'g' being mostly heritable.

2018-12-14 04:36:22 UTC  

Exposure to US and European models

2018-12-14 04:36:45 UTC  

I never disagreed with g

2018-12-14 04:36:57 UTC  

I came in just during IQ test discussion

2018-12-14 04:37:43 UTC  

>Exposure to US and European models
Are you saying that exposure to different cultural practices can increase IQ for groups like blacks?

2018-12-14 04:37:50 UTC  

No god no

2018-12-14 04:37:55 UTC  

Ok lol

2018-12-14 04:38:04 UTC  

I am saying a U.S book based test versus European logic test

2018-12-14 04:38:11 UTC  

Which deals with pattern recognition

2018-12-14 04:38:30 UTC  

Ie: dots moving in patterns for example