You put so much stake into this that I guarantee that you've taken at least two

The second when the first scored lower than you thought you should be

Me taking an IQ test or not has no bearing on IQ science.

sure is POLITICS in here

ScIeNcE iS PoLiTIcS

kike

IQ science has a lot of political implications.

science is facts not politics

empirical, observable, experimentally repeatable facts.

only science I need to know

is helicopters

gravity

and commies

https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(12)00584-3

Yeet a thousand commies out of a helo

Enjoy. A Canadian study on why IQ testing and IQ is flawed as a whole.

test gravity

What's the bias correction on a canuckistani anti-IQ paper?

Around the turn of the 2010s, IQ has been pushed by by academia and universities as flawed.

@Deleted User Alright, I'll give it a read.

The same academia and universities run almost universally by anti-science pro-feels commies.

Mensa are even shifting from it FYI

That's uncomfortably close to an argument from authority

There are about 5-10 studies on IQ this decade alone but, it's five am. I just rolled over and posted the first one I found

As I hate that "cite your sources shit," when the OG person asking never cited anything

@RoflTank

I distinctly remember in Uni IQ being pushed away.

Basically it is like measuring height in terms of basketball.

It's a good metric but, it doesn't mean just cause someone is short they aren't a good basketballer

Again, the standard IQ test measures different intelligences.

It's not the go to test anymore. They use a lot more tests including IQ to get intelligence.

Yes

What tests?

*generalized* IQ is no longer the bar

I know about scanning

I don't know of any other test.

Studying a child/person from childhood to adulthood. Standard IQ test. Scanning. Etc.

About three ways I know of.

It's like how big brain niggas can be so fucking dumb

^

Because they might be book smart but have no common sense

Booksmart you mean