general-text๐ฟ
Discord ID: 471844105463529472
685,872 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 61/6859
| Next
Do you have a high sexdrive?
Define "high".
Sex isn't exactly at the forefront of my mind so probably not
High- You want to have "SeX" with women
Eventhow you now what women really are
Know*
So, just wanting to have sex with a woman means that you sex drive is high? What if you really only want to have sex with a woman once a year?
I am 24 and a virgin in that
@the adventures male some people mature later
I'm over it. once I was an Incel before Incel was a thing
When I was 23, I looked like 17
Then I dicided that women now dosn;t worth my time and energy
That's the spirit of mgtow!
And a highlight on energy
Most of Incel's let women standarts dicatat threir day
@the adventures male what was the last drop that retrieved you from the inceldom?
Seeing my father
after a long time
And watching Mgtow videos
In the beginnig I had a lot of Red pill rage
@the adventures male I don't see a problem with men being virgins... I do see a problem when male virginity becomes pathological.
I did try to bring a incel to the mgtow communitie, but he was extremely stuborn
Usually "male sex drive" is used to suggest that men are not adults unless they have been with a woman.
This sort of thing is up for debate even in MGTOW circles and other spaces of the "manosphere".
But you gave me an idea.... Mention his father @the adventures male
@Seven Of Swords true, being a man has no relation with losing virginity
The blackpill has so truth to it
There is no such thing as a male "virgin".
But Incels think that women will solve their problems
So, that begs the questions: 1) How high does a man's sex drive need to be in order to determine whether or not his denial of sex is important enough to his identity as a man, and 2) what responsibility does a man have to himself if he does decide that sex is important to his identity, yet he is not lucky when it comes to having sex with woman? and lastly 3) is it that a man wants to have sex with a woman or that men love the image of sex with a woman more?
I hope that soon artifical women becoms a reality
@Dango_chan Interesting. Care to explain?
@the adventures male I think that to want an artificial woman is to want the image of women, but not women themselves.
That's what I meant
like the replicatiors from Blade runner
I think that most men are in the category lol
just without hypergamy and the usual BS
We fall in love with the image of what an ideal woman could be, not what they are.
Truth. I fell to this trap a lot of times
Many men do.
The whole male-mother need thing plays into this.
One of the biggest lies that the plantion sold us as a little childern is disney old crtoons
The one's from the 90's
Tarzan.hercules.aladin
Yeah, its a huge problem.
And sinks in to your brian
brain
Then there is a generation of cucks and Incels
that worships Pussy like a cross
I'd rather just say that they are confused rather than suggest that they are inferior because of it lol
I was one of them XDD
The "red pill" as much as I hate the analogy, is a great way to combat false and silly notions that society wants us to believe.
You are right after I TOOK THE RED PILL I started to see things diffrently
Soon 90% of man will be Mgtow
and 40% in monk mode
and the other 50% will do pump and dump but after I SAW TFM last video. It makes me think that pump and dump won't be an option
I don't know about that, but I do think that more and more men will become more and more disillusioned in the current sexual market place.
Pump and dump is growing increasingly risky.
With STDs and what not
Super STDs, false accusations, potential pregnancy trapping, etc.
its all dogshit, imo
Mgtow right now is an alterntive to the feminisem and the left
For man
Once you interact with a female in a sexual manner she instantly becomes a liability. So it's easier just to stay away from that bs and worry about yourself
We need to wait till an alterntive to women will be avaible
In 5 years we will witness a new era
Define "alternative". Do you mean in the sense of what a woman can potentially provide to a man or an alternative to sexual reproduction? Because for one, we don't need women. All a woman does is provide a relief for sexual tension and companionship; both of which aren't necessary for our survival as men. Our needs and our wants are oceans apart. Now when it comes to sexual reproduction, that's where I think it gets tricky. Sure we can have test tube babies and skip the sex all together; however, I doubt that'll happen any time soon.
Thinking is awesome, isn't it?
Limited in many respects, but a great way to explicate and consider ideas nonetheless.
I'm talking about sex bots
True, the expression of one's own ideas and thoughts is extremely limited. That's why you hear people say things like, "It's hard to put into words". Finding a way to articulate your thoughts can be difficult at times
Btw soon Joi from blade runner will become reality
Smasung has listed a pantet of a hologram machine
Samsung
If you're talking about sex robots then that's an alternative to what women can provide. Instead of going to a woman for sex you can go to a sex bot. But the fact remains, you don't need to have sex; you want to. However, you can't be blamed for that. It's only natural to have a desire for sex. But to deny your sexual nature as a man is what MGTOW is about, right?
You have VR wifus, There is a big demand for those products
@Leather Collector I still think that the distinction that you made is important, however. Let's say that we all of the sudden had the technology next week to essentially make a machine that could sexually reproduce with men. How much like a woman should it be? Is it possible to essentially build a" woman" with all of its parts being an improvement or near identical to a biological woman without themselves being hypergamous?
No Mgtow is about being a free man
As man alweys do we will find a solution to this problem
We discoverd fire
We created our wastren world
How much like a woman should it be? Well I guess that depends on the consumer. For all intents and purposes the machine was built to reproduce; so it doesn't need to resemble a woman. However, it depends on the consumer whether or not it is to resemble a woman. I'd imagine that the manufacturer would allow full customization of said machine, so whether or not it resembles a woman is, again, up to the consumer
Interesting.
It need's to look like women, have a good A.I, artifical skin
bones, warmth, artifical womb.
At that point it'd pretty much be like Bladerunner 2049. A bioengineered human. Then we'd have the same ethical issues that the universe of Bladerunner has
@Leather Collector I didn't mean "resemblance" per se, I meant it more in an essential/mereological sense. If in order to reproduce, it may be the case that biogenetics and bioengineering may need to essentially build, for all intents and purposes, an entire women in order for the correct combination of parts that makes up a woman (hormones, immuno-pathological systems, organs, etc.), in order for the reproductive function to occur.
Nope, Soon all the norms in our world will change
Humens right now are more narcssistic then ever
Do to instegram and facebook
They won't really care in the end
So, if hypergamy is too integral to femininity even at the level of the actual parts that allow for reproduction in the first place, can we make a series of machines that can still reproduce with men even though its not clear if how many parts or combinations of biological system may be necessary to separate out hypergamy instinct from a feminization of parts?
Hypergamy comes from the lizard brain
if we find the part that responsibale for attraction and alter it to our imaget then women will see you as a 10/10
Well then I suppose if that were the case then it would have to essentially be an artificial woman. But if you wanted to avoid the hypergamous nature of women, it would have to be engineered to adhere to it's owner. They could be designed from the bottom up. They could be lifeless husks that exist only to please it's owner or it could have a limited amount of intelligence. It's entirely subject to the machine's owner as to how human the machine will be. @Seven Of Swords
@Leather Collector But how would a human owner do that though?
We don't need to go tohse lengthes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpmwSYOV3DA this cancer was in my recommended feed and I can't even respond to it because it's so stupid
685,872 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 61/6859
| Next