correct

And its also precedent in the making

The question is should they be regulated.

right

a disgusting precedent

and its this stuff that puts that into question

i say makem utilites

nvm make a bill of internet right

utilites would protect them

we've had conflicting

cases

twitter being a public forum

Well its policing of behaviour on social media without any legal recourse

that the president can't block people

and now bannings

Able to cause big monetary dmg

I don't htink they can have it both ways...

I have another question.

Why was InfoWars banned? Did he make a tweet on that account with the same video?

Where did the video orginate?

on twitter

periscope

On the platform.

look up

There are two accounts.

If saying "no one will ever love you" is grounds for a permanent ban, then what about saying an entire race of people are only fit to live underground like groveling goblins?

thats ok cuz jeong was a slit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ne_wFdA-1oU This was the video

thats bullshit i was watching so many versions of that vid today

http://archive.is/ESvhu

Jones's unpersoning is complete. Who is next?

I mean he does call him a Rat and No one will ever love you so doesn't that violate their terms

http://archive.is/Lrcp0

So if you're mean to someone in a public space you can get booted off the internet.

Here are the timelines prior to being kicked off

No, I disagree with it, but I mean it is Twitters terms of service and he was streaming on their platform

Twitter is an antitrust lawsuit waiting to happen so it doesn't get to hide behind its TOS.

Interesting point by Tim.

Twitter is claiming not to enforce their rules ex post facto.

I can't wait until the Courts rule that they can't censor people aside from inciting violence, but at the same time this is a clear violation of TOS

That is why he was not banned previously.