Message from @Rabbi Shekels
Discord ID: 488875736027889664
and i mean known...to the police known.
if you're still watching the Tucker video, I think that's most of the point Tim made.
Are you in the UK, Grenade123?
his fault is assuming that Tucker wasn't making the same point
and no, why?
Oh, that comment about the rape gang known to the police sounds like something people talk about concerning the UK.
This is perhaps another formulation of the paradox of tolerance.
i watch sargon
lol
Ah, ok.
but that was more or less the joke
saying you are afraid of your daughter being raped becomes racist and therefore "bad" if the perp is Muslim. which is ridiculous .
What's going on the UK is bonkers. Somewhere they went off the god damn rails.
when you are so afraid of being called racist, you stop going after criminals, you have lost your way
So @Timcast brings up the difference between legitimate and illegitimate authority in his banned books video today. I'd like you to reconsider the anarchist position on authority, Tim -- because even by your definition you acknowledge that authority is not something held by a person over another, but rather a deferment by a person to another they think is authoritative.
well if you think that law is our commonality, I would agree.
a lack of enforcement...we can no longer breed.
we are too diverse. cat and a dog.
Using your argument, anyone can say "I'm a doctor, put your hands on that wound" whether they're a doctor or not. Anyone can put on a uniform and say they're a police officer and "enforce" frozen zones.
That doesn't mean authority exists, it means people are deferring to someone they perceive as authority. It's no different than faith. People can have faith, but that does not objectively assert the existence of God -- it only subjectively asserts the deferment to God in that person's mind.
But even the idea of diversity is too diverse to properly quantify. It includes far too many factors just to say that you need more "diversity".
i don't watch youtube anymore, if i can help it.
u must watch jootube
Race? Skin color? Income? Wealth? Family? Relationships? Geographical location? You can't take everything into account all of the time.
Are different kinds of courts and legal systems within the same country "diversity of thought"?
generally we take it case by case.
for example. when someone breaks the law...
What about in France where some McDonalds franchise owners put up signs saying "no women allowed". It's not all McDonald's. You can just go to another. Is that diversity?
it's diversity amongst mcdonalds.
some allow, some don't, that is diversity.
Just make us fat McDonald’s please
Diversity of law breaking. White collar crime. Violent crime. Nonviolent crime. Drug crime. Miscegenation. Slavery. And it goes on...
this is why i think tim's thought was just not thought out completely. maybe he was rushed, or maybe his leftist bubble is real 😛
I think the main problem is that when someone says "diversity" you get a different answer per person.
He's probably just not playing devil's advocate enough and being far, far, FAR too generous when it comes to assuming people are 'good' or like him.
likely.
Like that black Apple diversity woman who got fired for saying that 12 white men could be diverse for having different backgrounds.
A lot of the liberals I know have this inherent believe that people from other cultures think exactly like them, and that the only differences are different languages, cloths, food, music, etc.
context, that's why i took it to the most general definition. differences