By etymological standards it's the same as a dictator.

'Rule by one'

Not really

It's family rule

by etymological standards.

Mon- means one.

And north Korea is a republic

Do ethnostatists seek to seize the means of production?

Nazis most certainly do.

And give it to the state?

Then that's their far left views

So, they adopt the extreme views of both wings

Radical

Centrists

Was the goal ever to make Hitler's kid the dictator in Hitler's death?

Or extreme authoritarian centrists

Sorry but I fail to see how they're right wing still

It's not hereditary rule

That's not what radical centrist means at all.

And Anarcho Primitivism is left is it not?

So is traditionalism just a matter of era?

@Schedrevka "Extreme authoritarian centrists"?

Not only that but being pro US constitution is at odds with pro monarchy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_centrism
Radical centrism is an actual ideology. You don't get to just choose what you want it to mean.

Oh jeeze, that has a definition?

shit.

I'm going to have to read that. and also stop calling myself a 'militant radical centrist' as a joke.

@Schedrevka Thanks, I never knew

neat

So, uh... I don't consider the Libertarian Party very right wing. Is that just me...?

I see them as more right than left.

Between centrist and conservative.

Like, I don't identify with them on most things.

It also seems extremely incohesive and cultish

at the same time...

I'm a libertarian conservative.

I get this sense that, only considering platform, it would be a lot easier to get the Republican Party to the libertarian stances it needs than it would be to get the Libertarian party to not be cultish.

When you consider that the Republican Party also gets the votes, the Libertarian party seems pointless.

Pointless at best, and Gary Johnson was actually fucking Open Borders at worst.

a bunch of them are AnCaps

everyone are typing.