Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 489625618221236274
They do
Lmao
not entirely sure I would say having a philosophical discussion is ...."fighting eachother"
I hope this is satire
If it is gg
Make students protest their professors
If not the left had complete brain rot
Question them, show different opinions
learn how to argue first.
instead of just resorting to ad hominem
@Paradox have you *been* to a libertarian convention? They strip nude on stage. Their "philosophical discussions" turn into lectures on how religion is a dumb idea. They get <5% of the vote. *They don't matter*
BTW, V. You're just misfortunately named. There's a comentator known as 'Vee'. He's a bit of a dumbass, and 'Kick Vee' became a Mantra.
I haven't been to any convention. I am not very political. And I don't like crowds.
Ok. Well everything I just said happens.
There's a reason the Libertarian party is marginal.
Can confirm
Pratel just summed up the average Libertarian meetup
It's the dumbest group you've ever seen. Meanwhile, go to a Republican or Democrat meetup. They might disagree on somethings occasionally, but most of the talk is *how to elect a candidate*
They will talk at great length the steps they need to acheive that goal.
If they don't matter, why are we talking about them?
I dunno.
What if it's Pra-tell?
```prat·tle
ˈpradl/Submit
verb
1.
talk at length in a foolish or inconsequential way.
"she began to prattle on about her visit to the dentist"
noun
1.
foolish or inconsequential talk.
"do you intend to keep up this childish prattle?"```
@pratel outdo was in reference to taking up bipartisan causes socialists like to claim dominion over, like police brutality
Irony that probably the smartest guy in the discord has a name spelled close to that. 😛
Wherein you can come up with a solution that works and undermines their platform all at once
I never actually decided on a meaning.
A less good but still funny example of this is the transparent backpack
It can work.
I'll split the difference.
It's an organizational strategy in general
It rhymes with Cradle now.
Doesn't have to be repubs
I'm thinking more of how social justice types will conspire to get each other into positions of power.
They justify their changes based on a perceived wrong