Message from @Poppy Rider
Discord ID: 489776826475085825
I don't mind this. So long as he actually molested someone, I don't mind it.
If it was just the possession of pornography, that'd be way out of line.
When people believe the state can't provide justice, they'll find someone who can
What if it was pictures of your kids?
Have they been talking about this? https://youtu.be/E5gPdrlyc84
```What if it was pictures of your kids?```
Then I'd be for the beheading the of the PEOPLE WHO MADE THAT, WOULDN'T I
The pedo himself isn't important here. It's that the system failed so utterly, and that someone took justice into their own hands *and rubbed the judge's nose in it*. We might have an emotional reaction to think "yeah fuck child molesters" but this is very clear evidence of political decay.
Have we forgotten the real real criminals? How do they always become mysterious phantoms when we've caught sight of someone who just has what they've produced?
Not the people that make it profitable endeavour?
Who says he PAID FOR IT?
That's the thing
How do you know it wasn't just fileshared shit
Guys you're getting distracted by the pedo aspect. That's not important here.
Lets just agree here people,
any form of application of sexuality to a child is BAD, and the people who do it should meet justice
So was he like tried and found guilty by a judge? Or was it a jury verdict?
Only real children.
If the child is imaginary, no harm is done, and therefore no foul.
@R9b1t he was released on bail as the judge ruled he was not being a danger to the community.
they're not a child then, they're imagination 😛
See, you don't get specific enough.
Nibwor#t
People have been jailed only hearing the way YOU phrase it.
Very similar to how the New Mexico compound families were released on bail.
So you are conflating real CP to loli are youj?
Me shower me mad
Poppy are you bein a butt?
***THE PEDO ASPECT IS UNIMPORTANT***
I'm trying to get you to shut up about your drawings
Atkins, the conversations has pivoted.
Stop trying to unpivot.
considering he was accused of raping a child, he's a molester, not just a pedo
The criminal could easily have been a murderer, or a rapist, or anything.
You can resume your argument when we've become disinterested in our own
He was accused of being a rapist
The important thing is that someone acted as a vigilante because the judge made a shitty decision.
Sure.
It's happened before.
And the vigilante specifically decided to rub the judge's nose in their failure.