And the judge simply decides he isn't a danger anyway.

--Well. Tough shit. Molestation is a death sentence.

With prepubescence there isn't a grey area.

If the state wants a monopoly on legitimate use of force,
The state should earn it respectfully, by actually having justice

If the people lose faith in the system, they'll find their own solution to get waht they want

Yeah, this is where the law is lacking.

This is why Antifa is so violent, they don't believe the state controls force either

Granted, the law is lacking THE OTHER WAY too

Jailing people for imaginary drawings? Fuck are we doing here?

If the state does not a) maintain a monopoly by punishing vigilantes and b) maintain legitimacy by being competent, fair, and impartial then BAD SHIT HAPPENS. You end up with a failed state and perpetual tribal warfare.

Okay, bad shit happens.

So far, it's only to a guy who has molested an 8 year old girl.

There's such a thing as "One and done"

The state is currently failing at being competent, fair, and impartial. Or at least being perceived as such.

exactly Atkins, and thats where we're at now

Might I point out, the guy hadn't been to trial yet.

Some fires just go out.

Y'know?

8 year old girl. Kill that guy. Okay done.

@Grenade123 but making the decision that a man accused of child molestation was not a danger to the community is an obviously terrible decision.

I agree with Grenade,

And the raping of a child was still an "accusation"

But the article did state he posessed CP

A society that refuses to take basic steps to protect its children is sick.

I think the CP is neither here nor there, if he obtained it without buying it.

I think it's SKEEVY.

But I'm only really upset when he's fueled the machine itself.

However, he molested. Now I want him to die.

And he is dead. So I'm happy.

Agreed, but it's also possible it was a false accusation with planned evidence. We don't know because it didn't get to trail

well, we don't know if he did molest anyone

Of course he should go to trial. I am not claiming that he should not go to trial. I am claiming the exact opposite.

If this was all a bitter revenge plot by the girlfriend?

What I am claiming is that if someone has been arrested on probable cause of a violent offense, they should remain in custody until trial.

A false accusation of the worst kind? And this is PROVEN?

I think she should serve life, or worse.

This man was arrested, there was deemed enough reasonable claims that he needs to defend himself, and he was killed before getting the chance to dsipute.

And that releasing them on such a low bail is evidence that the state was not competent.

30,000 is not low at all.

I'm surprised he was able to meet it.

I can haul $30k out of my ass

I couldn't.

That would put me away forever.

"Haha you're poor"