Message from @TylerC
Discord ID: 491330917827346442
Look at these bond villains.
```a suspect in the investigation potentially posed a threat to the safety of local staff and residents```
SO WE SHUT DOWN THE WHOLE TOWN AND BROUGHT IN BLACK HAWKS
yeah seems reasonable
....reasonable....
def more to that story
you dont sieze a building over something small
"a suspect"
that's all they have
this is bullshit
if they don't use names it's bullshit until proven otherwise
The helicopters were probably due to how extremely remote the place is.
ALIENS
No indication what they did or who they ~~did~~ are
who they did is their business
lol
What if, for example, there was a threat to blow up the observatory? The local security might be in on it so warning them might not be a good idea.
Have to bring in outside help. Outside help who can't get there quickly or without being noticed without using helos.
@Rabbi Shekels JIM SUCKS DONKEY COCK THROUGH A STRAW
HE EATS WHALE DONGUS BY THE BOATLOAD.
why would anyone want to blow up an observatory though?
LOOK RARE FOOTAGE OF JIM
i just cant think of a why
Ever seen steins;gate?
Nor can I
yes and it's amazing
everyone should watch it SUFFER THROUGH THE FIRST FEW EPISODES IF YOU DON'T LIKE THEM IT'S WORTH IT
You have your answer 😛
too-too-rooooo!
schizophrenia? who knows. i'm just speculating for things that don't involve international espionage, aliens, or the end of the world.
Obviously, it's SEARN /s
Yeah but they won't say what they did. Seems like "there was a potential bomb threat" is a pretty easy thing to say
ya its understandable , at this point its all speculation
i couldnt read the article at the moment to see if it said anything but im guessing no lol
it says literally nothing
your overlords took over a building, nothing to see here folks, move along
"suspect"
"danger to the town"
"we didn't say anything cuz we didn't want to warn suspect"
>standard form excuse for weird shit
too true
valid reason too, dont want to let the guy know you are onto him...
the first excuse according to the article was "security issue"