Message from @Atkins
Discord ID: 491947519614386186
but we have to send them back to the point of entry into the EU
Yeah since uk dont do id cards
we used to offer illegals £5k to go back to their country...
oh, used too
damn
they would go back... and then weeks later they would be back with their entire family
thought i could make 5k real quick
£5k each guys!
lol
thankfully they stopped that
hell, seems like a good way to fund something, just keep collecting your 5k haha
Omg that vid i post hit the 5:40 mark for lulz
looks like the EU is really trying to take NI from the UK
LOL contro, the Jaba speak got me
"Barnier still wants Northern Ireland to be treated as a separate customs jurisdiction from the rest of the United Kingdom."
I am so looking forward what "compromise" will they cook in the end
i bet ireland isnt too happy about that
😏
Ni increasingly pro leave of uk
According to polls
@Timcast "Is this what they all wanted? Vox, NYT, Buzzfeed journos all sharing that study that is rife with factual errors."
They don't care. This is not about truth. This is about power. These journalists sharing this document are giving it credibility, and the point of giving it credibility is to allow it to be used as a lobbying tool. They want to be able to point to this document to say "this is why you should ban people we don't like" - including you.
hopefully this pushing from the EU will make the union stronger...
And please don't refer to this as a study. There is no academic validity to this. No academic or journalistic standard. It's just a hit list.
***It's just about power***
was that from Twitter?
Yeah i said that too atkins
Tim on the warpath this morning?
Tim is falling into their trap.
It had shit methodology
Its like some bachelor's project
He's giving them the benefit of the doubt, and acting as if they are credible journalists who have made an error.
i keep forgetting there is a twitter feed bot in here
But even assuming they've made an error is assuming they have good intentions. They do not. They have put you on their hit list.
open society funded
These are not stupid people. They are not ignorant of journalistic ethics, ***they just don't care about them***.
1984 in 2018 woo hoo here we go!
im betting that list will start getting taken out by next month, they will let the hubbub of the story die down, possibly
It is confusing to me too
There was no error, the Open Society Foundation and Media Matters got the exact results they paid for.
Who peer review that "study" ?
It's not a mistake. It's not an oversight. It's not them being tricked or misinformed. This hit list was compiled the way it was compiled intentionally, and they're sharing and promoting it to give it the credibility it needs to be wielded against you.
Otherwise you can call anything a study