Who peer review that "study" ?

It's not a mistake. It's not an oversight. It's not them being tricked or misinformed. This hit list was compiled the way it was compiled intentionally, and they're sharing and promoting it to give it the credibility it needs to be wielded against you.

Otherwise you can call anything a study

thats how it starts, every time. get the list out there, build the fake rage, then take the action and watch no one care

Dude wtf

Well they putt JR on the list

jr?

I doubt much will happen

oh rogan right

Yep

nah, i can see them wanting him gone too

he allows too much wrongspeak

Rogan is poster child of youtube

agreed

this is where it will get interesting actually

Oh sjws hate him

Ofc

Why the fuck am i getting this shit im unsubbing asap

will youtube want to give up the ad dollars they get from rogan?

But youtube likes him

probably not

same reason why they wouldnt actually remove pewdiepie

Yep

Their previous publications mentioned Alex Jones, Roosh, Daily Stormer, 4chan/8chan and Gab as targets. Of those only the chans remain largely unaffected.

They're going to go after PJW next prolly

ya they are their own website, so cant just ban that the same way as a youtube account

no pateron to cancel for the chans

He's already associated with Infowars so that's strike 1 against Paul

ya i was sort of suprised he didnt get banned the same day as jones

He is political party member

It will not be as easy to ban him

i dont think thats why they kept him

Unless you make really good case

@TylerC https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DlsjHpBVsAA_wkt.jpg:large

Since deleted, but this tweet shows you that they are still working on taking down the chans.

Scott Adams is one of the smarter guys I think, he doesn't directly use youtube, he goes on Periscope and fans upload it

oh sure, that will never stop

but come on

the chans will out live us all

will be nothing but roaches and the chans after the nuclear war lol

They need chans as containment place