Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 493318352081780737
To be fair there wasn't much else going for the first movie.
but I think people enjoy at least the superificial difference of having a lesser known, more obscure character show up
MCU doesn't have the rights to my favorite guys, Magneto and Dr Doom
So I don't watch
didnt they buy Fox's shit?
or has that not gone through still?
idk, some ppl watched thor just to see how different it was...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCQug0FEvZ0
They bought Fox's entertainment stuff yeah.
All the X-men movie rights are Sony though, but they've been teaming up with them more
They should just make the X-people with characters like "Tazmanian Devil"
how were the X-Men movie rights Sony's if Fox was the distributor?
like the whole point behind buying Fox was getting X-Men and Fantastic Four (so they can stop being blown up in the comics :^) )
ya i thought spiderman was sony, xmen were fox
Oh yeah, I was wrong on that one
Also they can start putting the X-men on their merch
Like they were selling shirts of iconic comic covers in Target or whatever and removing the X-men from them
I'm genuinely disappointed that they didnt try to milk Civil War and actually do the whole thing
granted, they would have fucked it up
but it wouldnt have been dudes in suits on a runway
I mean they could actually do a better job of it now, since they have access to everyone finally
They did a better job at making Iron Man appear sympathetic though
In the movie than in the comic
hopefully they don't fuck up Avengers vs Xmen
When are they making a Marvel vs Capcom movie
when they can make a good game again
@Timcast based on the outline of what you mean by rare, and such, and saying over 50% would be what youd call common, i would say false accusations are common.
Seen as we can proof something between 29% and 41% of accusations individualy to be false beyond a shadow of a doubt (data from 2009 germany and 1994 US respectivly)
The disagreement isnt about the term rare its about the data
where I live it's over 50 percent
It may be but you probably cant proof it in over 50% of cases
or maybe you can
the 29% and 41% figures are actualy lowballs
based on ONE piece of evidence which in itself does proof that its a lie. In case of 29% and germany, selfinflicted injuries presented as stemming from a rape, in case of 41% in the US based on the accuser ADMITTING to have lied. There may well be evidence proving other accusations false as well
In any case i would aquitt if i was in the US and in the jury of a rape trial. Regardless of evidence
If i personaly saw the guy chasing then holding down a struggling woman, i would not convict
Reason being, it couldve been some BDSM playsession
she may have had a safeword
and becouse her sexual history cant be used as evidence, the defense cant announce this fact.
If a fair trial is impossible, you have no choice but to aquitt
And im not the first to say exactly that