Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 493317834802331648
well I mean people watched Thor for cheesecake
lets be real here
To be fair there wasn't much else going for the first movie.
but I think people enjoy at least the superificial difference of having a lesser known, more obscure character show up
MCU doesn't have the rights to my favorite guys, Magneto and Dr Doom
So I don't watch
didnt they buy Fox's shit?
or has that not gone through still?
idk, some ppl watched thor just to see how different it was...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCQug0FEvZ0
They bought Fox's entertainment stuff yeah.
All the X-men movie rights are Sony though, but they've been teaming up with them more
They should just make the X-people with characters like "Tazmanian Devil"
how were the X-Men movie rights Sony's if Fox was the distributor?
like the whole point behind buying Fox was getting X-Men and Fantastic Four (so they can stop being blown up in the comics :^) )
ya i thought spiderman was sony, xmen were fox
Oh yeah, I was wrong on that one
Also they can start putting the X-men on their merch
Like they were selling shirts of iconic comic covers in Target or whatever and removing the X-men from them
I'm genuinely disappointed that they didnt try to milk Civil War and actually do the whole thing
granted, they would have fucked it up
I mean they could actually do a better job of it now, since they have access to everyone finally
but they blew the name on Cap3
They did a better job at making Iron Man appear sympathetic though
In the movie than in the comic
hopefully they don't fuck up Avengers vs Xmen
When are they making a Marvel vs Capcom movie
when they can make a good game again
@Timcast based on the outline of what you mean by rare, and such, and saying over 50% would be what youd call common, i would say false accusations are common.
Seen as we can proof something between 29% and 41% of accusations individualy to be false beyond a shadow of a doubt (data from 2009 germany and 1994 US respectivly)
The disagreement isnt about the term rare its about the data
where I live it's over 50 percent
It may be but you probably cant proof it in over 50% of cases
or maybe you can
the 29% and 41% figures are actualy lowballs
based on ONE piece of evidence which in itself does proof that its a lie. In case of 29% and germany, selfinflicted injuries presented as stemming from a rape, in case of 41% in the US based on the accuser ADMITTING to have lied. There may well be evidence proving other accusations false as well
In any case i would aquitt if i was in the US and in the jury of a rape trial. Regardless of evidence
If i personaly saw the guy chasing then holding down a struggling woman, i would not convict
Reason being, it couldve been some BDSM playsession
she may have had a safeword
and becouse her sexual history cant be used as evidence, the defense cant announce this fact.