Well its in law that they can

In doing so don't they become a publisher instead of a platform? IE open themselves up to libel.

There is special law actually

They can remove anyone without any reason

watching the Linux video

The problem starts when its gov telling them who to censor

nah, starts long before that

Like they did with those Iranian links

yes, but he is a government official. he is a representative of the government. While he has no power over twitter, that is the government trying to violate us citizens first amendment rights.

if these people succeed in toppling meritocracy as a whole society will collapse

freedom of speech is more than just freedom from government force.

Well in principle yes

In law no

as such, he is unfit for office

But what if Trump wants someone who isn't a U.S. Citizen removed?

so i hope he gets removed

Then are no rights violated?

this isn;t trump, this is the senator for my state

>purple wave
UKIP victory, Rule Britannia

Lel

and it may be a violation of the first amendment even if its not a us citizen actually

The thing about ukip

UKIP needs to take over the whole of the commonwealth for sanity to return.

depends on what the wording is

Which sargon omits

In gis videos

Is that it contains the eternal boomers?

Is they used to have plenty councilors few years back

And they all got wiped out

Because of infighting and coruption

They realy need inside party structure reform

Or it will repeat

The UKIP party?

Yep

How would you say they should go about that?

Did you guys hear that "leaked" UKIP chat with Sargon and the religious conservative?

The one Vee was in for whatever reason

Nope.

rally Ukip around dank

First thing is to make the internal processes transparent and online

With bigger power to members