Not lan

Different

Dhcp is to correct lan issues

But wan is handled by modem

Otherwise you will have modem acting as router and router being router, you will get 2 routers

It does look like a DHCP client issue involving eth0.

Not really

Their modem gives a private ip on startup, then gives a public ip on link establish with internet

"?Looks like the dhcp client under eth0 made zebra thinking the broadcast address wasn't right. If WAN/Internet access is fine then there isn't much to worry about. You can try renew dhcp for eth0 see if the message would occur again, also you can check "show interface ethernet eth0", "show ip route", and "show ip route forward" outputs see if anything doesn't look right"

It is still routing fine since internet worked for days on end

that was from the post i linked earlier

but on a different note, have you tried power cycling the modem?

and any other routers on the network

Yes

The error was after the power cycle, about 1 hr after

Where on earth is it getting '255.255.255.255/24 != 82.xx.xxx.xxx'? The IP settings on eth0 must be jacked up.

Dhcp from isp is stupid

It goes from private to public

I read that as ICP

I'm like

the fuck do juggalos have to do with this

DHCP is standard for ISP's.

Not when they go from private ip to public ip

That doesn't matter for the DHCP configuration of the public interface on the home router.

NAT lies above the physical interface configuration.

Nat is layer 3, issue is at layer 2

Or at layer 1

I'd say the issue is at the DHCP server on the ISP side.

So how does a potential misconfig at L3 affect L2

Most likely

But isp playing me by saying they dont see an issue

The L3 misconfig is in the DHCP configuration being sent by the ISP's DHCP server.

But ip i recognize is fine, so even if the dhcp is misconfig, i got the right routing

This that misconfig is equivalent to spam log, since it does not affect routing

At least for me

I already asked this with the devs that made the router, i showed my routing, they concluded it is spam log sonce routing in routing table is fine

255.255.255.255/24 sounds like garbage sent by the DHCP server.

https://twitter.com/MomesMolli/status/1046076016765145088

Ok, well, if the eth0 config actually shows valid address and network and broadcast for what I assume is an 82.x.x.x/24 address then it's the log message that's garbage.

I'm not esp knowledgeable with routing but I was under the impression broadcasting is handled by the router @ the local subnet. How would 255.255.255.255 be a misconfiguration if that address is supposed to be resolved to that subnets broadcast ip? Or do I just not know what I am talking about here

I'm probably wrong here, just curious and I studied a little bit of routing once upon a time