Message from @Mana
Discord ID: 496444906504585236
@Beef Taquitos He classifies himself as such
He said good social justice, you dink.
His openning statement on the munk debate
there is no such thing as good social justice
that's like dry water or cold fire
😐
Then you are dishonest.
Don't be obtuse.
it's like *ethical child porn*(you guys might not get the Destiny reference there)
Don't be obtuse.
says the person repeating themselves.
I wouldn't have to.
But you continued.
Social justice is a cancer. The only good social justice is no social justice.
Anything that purports to be "justice" besides actual justice is garbage
Yo folks if Social Justice is a religion then Tim is agnostic? <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
~~: Prove me wrong.~~
sorry, that's not the meme
: Change my mind.
Equality of opportunity existed before "social justice". Equality of outcome is what social justice was created for.
He and you are wrong if you think it's about equality of opportunity.
Vague definitions is a problem. I've noticed that SJW people don't think equality of opportunity and outcome are different. If I remember correctly Thomas Smith said he was for equality of opportunity, but when pressed on it he said we measure equality of opportunity by the outcomes. Sorry, I might be side tracking the discussion you guys were having.
Same thing.
Well people having terrible understanding of *language and therefore terrible conclusions is pretty typical, which again is why I think he's arrived at a bad definition of social justice.
He's pretty reasonable so I don't think he's got bad logical processes
I compare it to feminism here because every time you try to nail down feminism it boils down to "equality" which is a wholly inappropriate definition both for the concept and how they implement it. Same with the way social justice is being defined here and how he seems to deal with it.
Does Tim clarify what Kanye meant about the 13th amendment thing?
I don't remember him mentioning that
just remember him agreeing with him about a lot and not knowing wtf he was saying a lot, which tends to be how kanye works
I haven't watched the latest video yet, so I can't comment on it yet. It would not surprise me though if Tim is still trying to hold on to a word the SJWs are corrupting.
I didn't watch the clip and I didn't know he mentioned that when he was speaking so I'd say unless I was heavily distracted, no tim didn't mention it
The SJWs are literally the zealots of the concept, they're not corrupting it, they're the inevitable outcome of it
equality was a thing before social justice, it will be a thing long after social justice
Well this will be a long read
most of the time social justice is a way of virtue signalling your worth to others these days, so perhaps it is being corrupted by competition, if only in the extremes it's being taken to
```"the visible hand,"```
Oh jesus it's the nega-libertarians
or was it ancoms I forget
@oprahsminge Does he actually get into what it meant in 2009? cuz I'm only seeing comparisons and definitions of what it meant hundreds of years ago which is wholly irrelevant to us today, as anyone who called themselves a "democrat" a hundred years ago could tell you when looking at current democrats.