but I don't buy she was initially trying to ruin the allegation

look check this

She sent the letter to DF and WaPo

She said she just wanted the info out there.

yeah?

ok AFTER that, and i mean WEEKS later

she gets the law firm

Repubs should stop taking the high road and fight dirty like the dems, start by making the FBI conclusion public <:OMEGALUL:405859646042275851>

I have every belief that she did actually just want to help at first (as retarded as she clearly is)

It's hard to say if its being stupid or what

and the law firm (who is a stooge of DF And dems) was used to sensationalize things

that's just where I'm at

There is certainly contradicting logic here

and used to pressure her into turning this further into a complete circus

You wouldn't put the info out if you didn't want it to affect the situtation

but she didn't put it OUT there

She did

she put it in the hands of politicians who she expected to keep it confidential

No.

She wanted to be kept out of it

she wanted the info out

her mistake was listening to politicians

Keeping her identity private is different from keeping the info private

She said she wanted the info to get to Trump and the Senate

which she did

weeks ahead of time

*months

go rewatch her testimony

She submitted her info in July.

I know

To a newspaper and to some lawmakers.

My point is she clearly wanted the info to affect the situation

why else would you release it?

Go look at how CONFUSED she is about the question asked about what democrats did in her stead

as in why they didn't keep it confidential

i mean im not saying she shares NO responsibility in this

im saying that they took her relatively small amount of impact and inflated it to such a degree that we get this

Y'all wanna feel some feels

god how long till scrib shows up?

sorry didn't mean to distract, continue

I agree. Maybe we're talking about different things. My issue is that she believed not only that she could throw a wrench into his nomination but could do so via anonymous claims.