Thinking you can bring someone down on anonymous allegations ... no sympathy

That's not how it's going to pay out though.

If the Republicans try and tighten the noose without something really hard, it'll just backfire.

Im just glad i have enough self respect to tell this whole thing was BS

The only way to really hurt her would be to go after her institution.

Which would, by necessity, broaden to the entirety of academia.

Frankly, Academia deserves it and it's long overdue

@trapexit That's fine. I'm just pointing out i do. Prior to the circus, the worst that would have happened is there would have been an ideally quiet debate about the credibility of the allegations

if dems weren't awful and fucking insane

But I don't think people have the guts or discipline to really wage that fight.

that's how it is supposed to work

@oprahsminge I get you are... I'm saying that to think, as she said she did, that you could ruin such a process totally anonymously is a concerning belief and hard to imagine she didn't understand what she was saying.

Right i get that

but I don't buy she was initially trying to ruin the allegation

look check this

She sent the letter to DF and WaPo

She said she just wanted the info out there.

yeah?

ok AFTER that, and i mean WEEKS later

she gets the law firm

Repubs should stop taking the high road and fight dirty like the dems, start by making the FBI conclusion public <:OMEGALUL:405859646042275851>

I have every belief that she did actually just want to help at first (as retarded as she clearly is)

It's hard to say if its being stupid or what

and the law firm (who is a stooge of DF And dems) was used to sensationalize things

that's just where I'm at

There is certainly contradicting logic here

and used to pressure her into turning this further into a complete circus

You wouldn't put the info out if you didn't want it to affect the situtation

but she didn't put it OUT there

She did

she put it in the hands of politicians who she expected to keep it confidential

No.

She wanted to be kept out of it

she wanted the info out

her mistake was listening to politicians

Keeping her identity private is different from keeping the info private

She said she wanted the info to get to Trump and the Senate

which she did

weeks ahead of time

*months

go rewatch her testimony