Message from @trapexit
Discord ID: 497045664732282890
There is certainly contradicting logic here
and used to pressure her into turning this further into a complete circus
You wouldn't put the info out if you didn't want it to affect the situtation
but she didn't put it OUT there
She did
she put it in the hands of politicians who she expected to keep it confidential
No.
She wanted to be kept out of it
she wanted the info out
her mistake was listening to politicians
Keeping her identity private is different from keeping the info private
She said she wanted the info to get to Trump and the Senate
which she did
weeks ahead of time
*months
go rewatch her testimony
She submitted her info in July.
I know
To a newspaper and to some lawmakers.
My point is she clearly wanted the info to affect the situation
Go look at how CONFUSED she is about the question asked about what democrats did in her stead
as in why they didn't keep it confidential
i mean im not saying she shares NO responsibility in this
im saying that they took her relatively small amount of impact and inflated it to such a degree that we get this
Y'all wanna feel some feels
god how long till scrib shows up?
sorry didn't mean to distract, continue
I agree. Maybe we're talking about different things. My issue is that she believed not only that she could throw a wrench into his nomination but could do so via anonymous claims.
I've seen few bring this up specifically.
People yell "due process" but seem to ignore that she explicitly said she didn't want due process by saying she wanted to influence the situation via anonymous claims.
@trapexit no wait
no
not necessarily true
lets be clear here
Yes you are right that she wanted to throw it in via "anonymous" claims
in reality they knew who she was
so lets say "confidential" claims
yeah?
OK, so part of this would have been, at that time, the FBI would have had to come out to question here