Message from @Abel

Discord ID: 497449766976749568


2018-10-04 16:39:12 UTC  

Dave Rubin on weed?

2018-10-04 16:39:18 UTC  

But yeah, what they're advocating for is the elimination of due process in cases where there are allegations of sexual harassment or assault.

2018-10-04 16:39:35 UTC  

It's as if they don't realize what that would let people do.

2018-10-04 16:39:55 UTC  

The scary part is that the kids seem on board with it.

2018-10-04 16:40:33 UTC  

I seriously wonder if they have heard the arguments for due process, presumption of innocence or anything of the like.

2018-10-04 16:42:57 UTC  

they wont understand untill they are accused

2018-10-04 16:43:07 UTC  

which is sad

2018-10-04 16:43:43 UTC  

all psychology studies show children and teens as well as seniors (points where the brain is still developing or in full degradation ) are highly susceptible to influence and authority - so if it is social norm, they accept without question.

2018-10-04 16:44:31 UTC  

so if the teacher doesn't believe, it's far easier to imprint that ideology on children

2018-10-04 16:44:44 UTC  

so in a generation (or less) we can see due process completely scrapped

2018-10-04 16:44:48 UTC  

if trends continue

2018-10-04 16:45:57 UTC  

also the reason I fervently oppose the voting age being dropped to 16...

2018-10-04 16:46:16 UTC  

I'm also against it.

2018-10-04 16:46:19 UTC  

I'm for raising it.

2018-10-04 16:46:34 UTC  

and take it away from Woman. I just need to say a name to prove that: Justin.

2018-10-04 16:47:09 UTC  

imo, voting age should be 21 or 18

2018-10-04 16:47:20 UTC  

there should be no voting age

2018-10-04 16:47:23 UTC  

there should be a voting exam

2018-10-04 16:47:26 UTC  

that you must pass

2018-10-04 16:47:27 UTC  

tfw 30 yo boomer

2018-10-04 16:47:46 UTC  

Or, make property ownership a requirement for voting.

2018-10-04 16:48:04 UTC  

Property ownership is dumb

2018-10-04 16:48:13 UTC  

having children would be better

2018-10-04 16:48:16 UTC  

voting exam is too risky to corrupt people making it discriminatory

2018-10-04 16:48:21 UTC  

yep

2018-10-04 16:48:29 UTC  
2018-10-04 16:48:33 UTC  

thats lunacy

2018-10-04 16:48:49 UTC  

discriminatory exams

2018-10-04 16:49:26 UTC  

just create an independent exam board
and then have it be reviewed by both republican and democrat boards
easy

2018-10-04 16:49:46 UTC  

i dont think it is that easy

2018-10-04 16:49:51 UTC  

i think it is

2018-10-04 16:49:57 UTC  

on the paper it should be who to vote for and brief description of the platform. Get the platform wrong or no platform listed invalidates the vote

2018-10-04 16:49:57 UTC  

dont get me wrong if it werent risky id support it

2018-10-04 16:50:14 UTC  

tornzy gets it

2018-10-04 16:50:23 UTC  

just a brief test on both party positions

2018-10-04 16:50:34 UTC  

i guess it doesnt have to be too into it

2018-10-04 16:50:37 UTC  

just basics

2018-10-04 16:51:03 UTC  

like middle school civics

2018-10-04 16:51:19 UTC  

it would still knock off a good 60% of voters

2018-10-04 16:51:39 UTC  

Do an exam to get your voting license

2018-10-04 16:51:56 UTC  

>point out that independent doesn't suck the corporate peen
>barred from voting by corporatist parties that insist they dont either
Off the top of my head