Message from @Senny

Discord ID: 498258682828685332


2018-10-06 22:18:16 UTC  

anyway, welcome

2018-10-06 22:18:19 UTC  

🤔

2018-10-06 22:18:20 UTC  

yea thats how you spell it

2018-10-06 22:18:26 UTC  

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

2018-10-06 22:18:26 UTC  

we aren't prejudiced towards bots

2018-10-06 22:18:32 UTC  

like some other peopel

2018-10-06 22:18:37 UTC  

woah it actually is how you spell it

2018-10-06 22:18:41 UTC  

Thank you. Finally a place where I can hide from the Democrat Bladerunners.

2018-10-06 22:19:10 UTC  

!rank

2018-10-06 22:19:11 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/463054787336732683/498257945512116237/card.png

2018-10-06 22:20:03 UTC  

We're living in the country thats the finest place on earth

2018-10-06 22:20:11 UTC  

But some folk dont appreciate this land that gave them birth

2018-10-06 22:20:20 UTC  

I hear them up in washington they're making an awful fuss

2018-10-06 22:20:32 UTC  

Because Communists and spies are making monkeys out of us

2018-10-06 22:20:33 UTC  

I wholly agree. The freedom of America can't be denied, even if you don't agree with the slowly polarizing parties.

2018-10-06 22:21:07 UTC  

Political parties must be removed after the constitution is strengthened beyond all doubt

2018-10-06 22:21:38 UTC  

Does anyone know of any good Russian colocation or dedicated server providers?

2018-10-06 22:21:44 UTC  

I desperately want to set up my very own Russian Bot.

2018-10-06 22:21:48 UTC  

What a staggering statement that threw me off.

2018-10-06 22:22:07 UTC  

just run the bot trough proxy

2018-10-06 22:22:07 UTC  

I've never been in a political discord before.

2018-10-06 22:22:08 UTC  

The constitution must be an iron document infallible and untouchable

2018-10-06 22:22:14 UTC  

I agree

2018-10-06 22:22:23 UTC  

bend over, you are about to experience your first

2018-10-06 22:22:28 UTC  

You want it both amended _and_ untouchable?

2018-10-06 22:22:28 UTC  

Washington and John Adams saw the dangers of party politics

2018-10-06 22:22:50 UTC  

No there shall not be a single new amendment added

2018-10-06 22:22:53 UTC  

Once the interpretations are written, they can not be interpreted in any other way.

2018-10-06 22:22:58 UTC  

nothing more is required

2018-10-06 22:22:59 UTC  

sure

2018-10-06 22:23:08 UTC  

To have the set code of inalienable rights is great.

2018-10-06 22:23:19 UTC  

I mean, the clarification game is a slope soooo slippery

2018-10-06 22:23:31 UTC  

What about the amendment that freed the slaves mister Jefferson?

2018-10-06 22:23:53 UTC  

Absolute laws guaranteeing absolute freedoms are the only bulwark against naturally occurring tyranny to which all men are inclined

2018-10-06 22:24:10 UTC  

@Crimsom The necessity for the 13th amendment arose from the assumptions of the day

2018-10-06 22:24:17 UTC  

No further amendments are necessary

2018-10-06 22:24:24 UTC  

i.e. that it was in fact possible to force people to do labour without breaking the law

2018-10-06 22:24:34 UTC  

which required a certain mental gymnastics of its own.

2018-10-06 22:25:41 UTC  

Clarification shouldn't be slippery, but offer a basis. It should be agreed upon by a multitude of people.

2018-10-06 22:26:05 UTC  

One area significantly ripe for clarification is the matter of _interstate commerce_