Message from @DrinksForFree
Discord ID: 501163899350024205
@DrinksForFree Which shipping lanes?
It does actually say something
USA missile defense system is outdated at this point, and not the best against ICBMs unless the missile launcher is close to where the ICBM is launched
they can have as many carriers as they like. our trident program doesnt rely on ships
subs silos and air
france has three uk has 2
And that's by count.
aircraft carriers are great for platforms to attack an area
like iraq
and those are not the US carriers but the small harrier carriers
nukes is totally different
want to go ballistic subs?
i promise you you wont like the result
please, tell me how you have the secret data on our trident program....
every peice of info is estimated
lol why are you being obtuse? you think nukes are a viable option in war?
yes
unless you are willing to fall to "salami tactics"
... so next war should just launch all avaible nukes.
we shouldnt however if the us and china go to war id be shocked if china didnt launch
they dont value life the same way the west does
and america will win any other way
with nukes both sides lose
all available nukes would cover the entire eaths surface. thats not smart
thats what i said, US has developed a massive anti ballistic missile defense network. China does not have enough ICBMs to beat the net of anti missile defense the usa have built
they only need a 10% sucess rate
there is a reason countries buy our anit ballistic missle defense systems.
one hits the san andreas fault
bye bye cali
although, that may be a good thing for the rest of the country lol
ummm.... no that would happen.
usa shouldnt have abolished Star Wars program
now that was a fantastic way of shielding a country
plus those missiles would have to destroy japan, alaska, and hawaii first before it can hope to send missiles to USA
depends how the war happened
no it doesn't
most likely is china invading japan
china only has land based ballistic missles