US is breaking rules by giving isreal 3.8bilion dollar every year as military aid.

how?

they're not giving Nuclear aid

which is the whole point

i've said so multiple times

We can't have this discussion if you just ignore facts for your own convenience 😦

how do we reduce the population to 1b?

and iran wants to build nuclear plants.

I'm perplexed though,

When Israel is doing what its allowed to do in full right, you claim them and anyone helping them lawfully to be in violation of the law

Yet when any enemy of Israel does it, "Oh they're prolly doing it for innocent purposes"

Iran want to build nukes but people will conveniently ignore that because they secretly (or not so secretly) want them to use it on Israel when they get them.

still, they have all the rights to build nukes

@Dr.Wol http://legcounsel.house.gov/Comps/Foreign%20Assistance%20Act%20Of%201961.pdf

Iran doesn't actually, they signed the Non-proliferation of Nuclear weapons pact

its breaking this aid act.

That's a piece of paper

If they physically can, they should

this is 300 pages long, can you atleast point me to the page where i'm supposed to be finding this violation?

The only thing that shall not be violated is the NAP.

That would be great but it's unrealistic.

Yeah. Sadly.

Can't violate the NAP if theres no one left to dispute you violating it at all 😉

Anarcho capitalism is my wet dream.

I'm a hypocrite tho

I want war

@Dr.Wol 165

yet i want ancapism

Why would you want war?

to reduce the population

why we need to reduce population?

and to have space to make my sadistic desires a reality

Wouldn't a virus be easier than war?

because humans are a desease

virus would be better

stop aid to africa is quik way to decrase population

but if there is a virus i can't torture people

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

nuking China and India would be good too

Okay Jasse first off

This document is from 1961, a full 7 years before the NPT was even signed by America

On top, the page you linked refers to
"—In providing assistance under this chapter
for the government of any independent state of the former Soviet
Union"

FORMER SOVIET COUNTRIES

they have nukes to fire back.

@Jasse that's a bonus

And it says NOTHING about nukes, cuz that treaty wouldn't be signed for another 7 years